- Messages
- 68,056
Rammo said:They'll win in Perth because England won't be able to handle the bounce.
there is?
tell me more
Rammo said:They'll win in Perth because England won't be able to handle the bounce.
yep that pitch is deader than a dodo.Twizzle said:all the bounce has gone from the WACA
aussies1st said:Two spinners on the WACA what a sad sight it is for cricket.
yeah he's real sh*t,almost 200 test wickets at a strike rate better than warney's. probably alan tongue would be a better bet than Mcgill.skeepe said:MacGill is sh*t.
I'm sick of his "I deserve to be selected" attitude also.
:crazy: scary thought.aussies1st said:Lol someone even crazier than locky
lockyno1 said:Skeepe, you are a idiot.
skeepe said:I'm sorry, but MacGill is awful. I have been proven right on almost every single thing I have posted, and I will be proven right on this also.
skeepe said:I'm sorry, but MacGill is awful. I have been proven right on almost every single thing I have posted, and I will be proven right on this also.
Correct, proven by this Tri Series and his awful year. He's been penalised at the rate of 1-2 high tackles a game, also proving he's a grub as I've been sayingJJ said:There is medication available for severe hallucinations
Let's recap... your views include:
Nathan Hindmarsh being nuffy
CorrectAllan Tongue being the #1 lock in league
Correct, and also correct about his terrible attitude that he's entitled to be in the teamStuart MacGill being awful
On the balance of evidence, correct. For more info, see the Darrell Hair decision and sanjane.Subbies being racist white hating merkins
Whilst I appreciate you devoting so much of your time to my posts, this thread is not about me. It's about the test selection. Obviously, the selectors don't believe MacGill is up to it, and that's good enough for me.You have any other gems to add?
JJ said:but on this topic, MacGill's test record stacks up pretty well against anyone's - to suggest he's awful shows how profoundly ignorant you are.