Let's face it, he has 2 years left on his contract. He should not even have to think about anything else but playing good footy for the 2 years and get paid good coin. If he does not have an option to go somewhere else this would have gone away no questions asked. He obviously has hence why the kaos. Do you honestly believe nobody be it his manager or another club has not been in his ear to leave the club and join them? If you have no option you put up and wait as there is nothing to think about but play for the 1 club. If the NRL cave in that is pretty disrespectful to the player as the rules are in place they should not be changed to suit others when they need to. Parra knew he would cost 850k so suck it up and lose a player or 2 if you cannot afford him. They cannot have their cake and eat it.
It's hard to argue with your points, in fact I mostly agree.
Nov 1 must be a running joke in the RL recruitment world and the NRL does nothing.
Of course he was in contact whilst under contract, initiated by either Parra or Lomax manager, but who in their right mind would offer Zac anywhere near what he was on with us?. But he was still determined to leave & requested a release 6 times.
Flanno knew if he applied the same rule to Zac, as Hunt, Dragons would be stuck paying massive overs for a centre playing in any position, because no club would take that hit on salary cap.
He doesn't want to be here fine. Lets see if you can get the same money elsewhere. You happy for mutual contract termination? YES!
If NRL impose 850 on Parra cap then Lomax basically has no job for 2 years. Too harsh a penalty even for an A'hole.
Lomax can't be motivated by money.
there is something else.