My tip is that if Dufty fails or is injured, it will be Lomax ahead of Field for first grade fullback. Reason is size and defence.Last year it was Dufty won’t get a run but his form in ISP(off a strong 20s campaign)meant he got the call when the time came.
I can’t see it being any different for Lomax after his debut v. Hull.
Thing is, he has to earn it as well.
My tip is that if Dufty fails or is injured, it will be Lomax ahead of Field for first grade fullback. Reason is size and defence.
My tip is that if Dufty fails or is injured, it will be Lomax ahead of Field for first grade fullback. Reason is size and defence.
Does anyone know how old Aitken was when he made his debut? I'm pretty sure Tedesco was 18 when he made his debut. Surely, if a players shows the skills, has the body shape, speed and talent, there should be no reason to select him on form.Lomax is just coming out of puberty. I'd rather he get a chance to prove his talent in the position he has played most of his junior career in before placing him in arguably one of the most important positions on the field.
Also, Dufty hasn't shown signs of failure as yet. Lets get behind him first.
Does anyone know how old Aitken was when he made his debut? I'm pretty sure Tedesco was 18 when he made his debut. Surely, if a players shows the skills, has the body shape, speed and talent, there should be no reason to select him on form.
Lol Aitken has failed to develop since his debut and Tedesco spent his first 2 seasons on the sidelines through injury.Does anyone know how old Aitken was when he made his debut? I'm pretty sure Tedesco was 18 when he made his debut. Surely, if a players shows the skills, has the body shape, speed and talent, there should be no reason to select him on form.
And what age were they?Lol Aitken has failed to develop since his debut and Tedesco spent his first 2 seasons on the sidelines through injury.
Not sure, but young. I’m not sure on the point your making - if it’s that we should promote him, then a struggling centre and a kid who busted his ACLs aren’t the best examplesAnd what age were they?
Bingo! They probably a little too young...Lol Aitken has failed to develop since his debut and Tedesco spent his first 2 seasons on the sidelines through injury.
Aitken debuted in March 2015 - about 3 weeks short of his 20th birthday.And what age were they?
I basically agree with “if good enough old enough” however there is no doubt the game is very different now to back then and the season is much longer.Tim Brasher was still going to school, when he debuted for Balmain, they went all the way to the Grand Final too and Brasher was great.
Brett Rodwell is another who was playing centre very well as an 18 year old. He played in the Panasonic Cup (mid week comp) final in his debut year
Laurie Daley debuted at 17 and was brilliant. He was playing origin at 18
Brad Fittler debuted at 17, while still at school, he played in a grand final in his rookie year and went on the Kangaroo Tour that year.
Andrew Ettingshausen debuted at 17 and had a long and successful career.
Reg Gasnier debuted at 17, went on to become an Immortal.
Phil Blake debuted at 18 and won Dally M Rookie of the year, he also played in the Grand Final that year
Brad Mackay debuted at 18 in the centres before moving to lock later in his career. He was playing origin by the time he was 20.
Greg Inglis debuted at 18. He played origin and for Australia the next year.
Jamie Lyon debuted at 18 and was playing for Australia the next season.
Steve Rogers debuted at 18, he played for NSW and Australia the same year.
Mal Meninga debuted at 18 in the Brisbane league
Brett Mullins debuted at 18. Canberra won the comp that year.
Darren Lockyer debuted at 18, he was playing reps by aged 20.
Terry Hill debuted at 18
John Simon debuted at 17.
If they're good enough, they're old enough.
I would say it is more likely that Mann goes to 1 or 6 and Aitken/Lafai plays centre .. but happy for you to keep your dream alive.