alien
Referee
- Messages
- 20,279
Correct.
Be disciplined, work hard to make SOUTHS great again.
Onya Madge!!!!!!
Greater than ever before!
Correct.
Be disciplined, work hard to make SOUTHS great again.
Onya Madge!!!!!!
Spot on.Greater than ever before!
Greater than ever before!
Spot on.
I think our performances over the last five weeks or so certainly saved Madge his job. Many people who were critical of him before have changed their minds but I don't think you can really blame them for asking questions of the coach. If you look at the South Sydney team that went on that losing streak and you compare it to the team that won its last 4-5 games, its like you were watching two different teams. Hence, I think it is only natural, when a team is losing frequently and playing badly to boot, that questions be asked of the coach.5 weeks ago Maguire was a very real chance of going. Inglis would never play fullback again, Sam was a shadow of the player he was in 2014, our halves prospects looked bleak with Reynolds down on confidence and no one else to play in the halves ( with inglis to never play fullback again walker would be fullback). Tom Burgess was on his way out, turner should retire etc. Who's to say that all the rumours about maguire on his way out sparked the team into actions and forced the changes we needed to make on and off the field.
I don't buy what you say about the referees having a major impact on our fortunes this year and being responsible for where we finished on the table. Yes, the refereeing has been horrendous in games we have played in and yes we have copped some absolute stinkers but so has every team in the competition; bad refereeing is not something exclusive to games that Souths have featured in this season. Just ask the Titans! They copped arguably the worst refereeing performance in finals football in over 40 years with their season on the line!I think the most important change to affect Souths was an attitudinal change on the part of the referees.
Rugby League is a remarkably simple game - hold the ball and control the ruck (that's the play the ball area for most of you simpletons) and you win the game.
The referees determined that Souths would not be playing semi final football this year, easy fix, penalise Souths in any tackle that the referee wanted and then allow any and all opposition to lay all over Souths to slow down Souths attack at every opportunity, allow one side to stand five metres and ensure the other side (Souths) stands twelve , thirteen - any body who didn't recognise that was what was going on is stupid.
There has been talk of police investigations into player and referees 'fixing' games and we have been told of a few Manly games that may be suspect, that players have thrown games - maybe so - but anybody with any sense at all can watch a game and see referee bias particularly when watching games with teams that they have no emotional attachment.
Amazing how the referees eased up on those ruck/play the ball/offside penalties and how Souths improved and were able to win a few games - I may be green but I'm not a f**ken cabbage.
No wonder people are dropping league and holding it with such seething contempt.
I personally do not hold Maguire in especially high esteem, basically for his lack of adaptability and his lack of any manner of change. His very high opinion of himself and his belief that he can take mediocre players and turn them into world beaters a la Craig Bellamy.
The classic example of this his absolute refusal to give Cook any reasonable time at the ball distribution role and sticking with that f**king jugheaded moron Cameron McInnes. I heard he's gonna player dominoes for NSW.
Like I said - broke a lot of good footballers in 2015 with his bash and barge bullshit, a number of them haven't recovered - maybe next year.
Interesting to see how Maguire goes next year.
Hope he doesn't do what all you clowns are screaming for, that is - just because a player comes on the market Souths shouldn't buy him. Christ one of you wankers said lets buy Farrah - he can teach the young guys when we put in reserve grade. You got no f**king idea
Great post great post very well explainedI think our performances over the last five weeks or so certainly saved Madge his job. Many people who were critical of him before have changed their minds but I don't think you can really blame them for asking questions of the coach. If you look at the South Sydney team that went on that losing streak and you compare it to the team that won its last 4-5 games, its like you were watching two different teams. Hence, I think it is only natural, when a team is losing frequently and playing badly to boot, that questions be asked of the coach.
I don't buy what you say about the referees having a major impact on our fortunes this year and being responsible for where we finished on the table. Yes, the refereeing has been horrendous in games we have played in and yes we have copped some absolute stinkers but so has every team in the competition; bad refereeing is not something exclusive to games that Souths have featured in this season. Just ask the Titans! They copped arguably the worst refereeing performance in finals football in over 40 years with their season on the line!
Our biggest problem all year has been hanging on to the football. Yes the hooking role has been a concern and I'll address that in the following paragraph but I still think our results would have been better had we managed to hang onto the footy more. Basically, you cannot have a completion rate of 70% or under and expect to win games in this competition. I think what compounded the errors and prolonged our form slump was a lack of confidence. Given the close nature of the competition, form is pretty much everything; the NRL is not like the English Premier League where you have an elite group of teams that have players of such immense talent that they can have an off day and still perform well enough to win. In saying that, I think it is pretty much inevitable that every team in the competition is going to experience a form slump at some point; its a bit like cricketers - regardless of how good a batsman/bowler you are, you are going to be out of form at some point. The most successful teams are those who have shortest form slumps.
I think the other factor which cost us this season was poor selections in the hooking role. Hooker is such a key position in the modern game as they are often vested with the responsibility of controlling the speed of the game and the direction of play, particularly in teams that do not have a commanding halfback like we do with Adam Reynolds. This topic has been a frequent bone of contention on these forums; I'd go so far as to say that I have never known a topic on here to cause so much debate and polarise opinion so heavily. Personally, I believe that Madge stuck too long with McInnes and should have dropped as early as Round 10. I'm sure he is a lovely lad and he often plays with his heart on his sleeve but I just don't think he has what it takes to be a first grade hooker. The guy lacks direction with his play and often executes plays without a plan and cannot control the ruck. You could see it numerous times throughout the season, where McInnes would pick the ball up, look for a split second before making his mind up. It doesn't sound like much but that split second can mean the different between taking advantage of a defensive lapse and playing against a defensive line that is reset. Moreover, it is no coincidence that ever since Cook was given a chance, we looked far more formidable in possession with the speed of the ruck increasing, our forwards getting a role on and plenty of purpose in our movement of the football.
In summary, I don't hate Maguire and I think it was the right decision to stick by him and we are lucky to have him given the lack of options out there on the market. However, I do feel that he has made mistakes this season that has put him in a position where he cannot afford to have a poor start to the 2017 season. With regards to the brand of football that he advocates, I personally don't see a problem with it. I hindsight I actually think Maguire is just being pragmatic and playing a style of football that best suits the skill sets of the players that he has at his disposal. For instance, we do not have an ultra creative halfback in Adam Reynolds who can improvise and play off the cuff like Thurston and Cronk can. Hence, it makes perfect sense to play a structured brand of football based on wearing the opposition down to suit Reynolds' strengths. Also, this whole idea that Maguire stifles naturally creative players is a whole lot of tosh. I personally feel that he has allowed the like of Cody Walker to run the football with freedom frequently and taken on the line as much as possible. Its important to remember that we are not playing a game of touch football here and that we cannot have players running around like headless chooks doing what they please.
The addition of Robbie Farah will complement Reynolds' abilities perfect I feel as he will bring the sort of ball-in-hand creativity that Reynolds lacks and take a lot of the play making pressure off him. One of the reasons why Taylor supposedly got rid of Farah was because he wanted a hooker who simply passed the ball to the halves instead of trying play-make from dummy half. I feel that style of hooker is exactly what we need in that in tough games against the better defensive teams, Reynolds can run out of ideas as the opposition know what he is going to do. The combination between Farah and Reynolds worked well in origin and there is no reason why it can't work well at club level. The biggest issue with the Farah signing is going to the off the field stuff. The guy has had problems with three coaches with him being the common denominator. However, given that he is will now be playing for a club where he is not as revered as was at the Tigers, I think it is unlikely that he will be afforded the same level of freedom to voice his displeasure as he previously was. Moreover, I think that if he has problems at Souths, he will forever be condemned as being a rogue and a trouble-maker, with Taylor's decision to get rid of him being fully justified.
I think our performances over the last five weeks or so certainly saved Madge his job. Many people who were critical of him before have changed their minds but I don't think you can really blame them for asking questions of the coach. If you look at the South Sydney team that went on that losing streak and you compare it to the team that won its last 4-5 games, its like you were watching two different teams. Hence, I think it is only natural, when a team is losing frequently and playing badly to boot, that questions be asked of the coach.
I don't buy what you say about the referees having a major impact on our fortunes this year and being responsible for where we finished on the table. Yes, the refereeing has been horrendous in games we have played in and yes we have copped some absolute stinkers but so has every team in the competition; bad refereeing is not something exclusive to games that Souths have featured in this season. Just ask the Titans! They copped arguably the worst refereeing performance in finals football in over 40 years with their season on the line!
Our biggest problem all year has been hanging on to the football. Yes the hooking role has been a concern and I'll address that in the following paragraph but I still think our results would have been better had we managed to hang onto the footy more. Basically, you cannot have a completion rate of 70% or under and expect to win games in this competition. I think what compounded the errors and prolonged our form slump was a lack of confidence. Given the close nature of the competition, form is pretty much everything; the NRL is not like the English Premier League where you have an elite group of teams that have players of such immense talent that they can have an off day and still perform well enough to win. In saying that, I think it is pretty much inevitable that every team in the competition is going to experience a form slump at some point; its a bit like cricketers - regardless of how good a batsman/bowler you are, you are going to be out of form at some point. The most successful teams are those who have shortest form slumps.
I think the other factor which cost us this season was poor selections in the hooking role. Hooker is such a key position in the modern game as they are often vested with the responsibility of controlling the speed of the game and the direction of play, particularly in teams that do not have a commanding halfback like we do with Adam Reynolds. This topic has been a frequent bone of contention on these forums; I'd go so far as to say that I have never known a topic on here to cause so much debate and polarise opinion so heavily. Personally, I believe that Madge stuck too long with McInnes and should have dropped as early as Round 10. I'm sure he is a lovely lad and he often plays with his heart on his sleeve but I just don't think he has what it takes to be a first grade hooker. The guy lacks direction with his play and often executes plays without a plan and cannot control the ruck. You could see it numerous times throughout the season, where McInnes would pick the ball up, look for a split second before making his mind up. It doesn't sound like much but that split second can mean the different between taking advantage of a defensive lapse and playing against a defensive line that is reset. Moreover, it is no coincidence that ever since Cook was given a chance, we looked far more formidable in possession with the speed of the ruck increasing, our forwards getting a role on and plenty of purpose in our movement of the football.
In summary, I don't hate Maguire and I think it was the right decision to stick by him and we are lucky to have him given the lack of options out there on the market. However, I do feel that he has made mistakes this season that has put him in a position where he cannot afford to have a poor start to the 2017 season. With regards to the brand of football that he advocates, I personally don't see a problem with it. I hindsight I actually think Maguire is just being pragmatic and playing a style of football that best suits the skill sets of the players that he has at his disposal. For instance, we do not have an ultra creative halfback in Adam Reynolds who can improvise and play off the cuff like Thurston and Cronk can. Hence, it makes perfect sense to play a structured brand of football based on wearing the opposition down to suit Reynolds' strengths. Also, this whole idea that Maguire stifles naturally creative players is a whole lot of tosh. I personally feel that he has allowed the like of Cody Walker to run the football with freedom frequently and taken on the line as much as possible. Its important to remember that we are not playing a game of touch football here and that we cannot have players running around like headless chooks doing what they please.
The addition of Robbie Farah will complement Reynolds' abilities perfect I feel as he will bring the sort of ball-in-hand creativity that Reynolds lacks and take a lot of the play making pressure off him. One of the reasons why Taylor supposedly got rid of Farah was because he wanted a hooker who simply passed the ball to the halves instead of trying play-make from dummy half. I feel that style of hooker is exactly what we need in that in tough games against the better defensive teams, Reynolds can run out of ideas as the opposition know what he is going to do. The combination between Farah and Reynolds worked well in origin and there is no reason why it can't work well at club level. The biggest issue with the Farah signing is going to the off the field stuff. The guy has had problems with three coaches with him being the common denominator. However, given that he is will now be playing for a club where he is not as revered as was at the Tigers, I think it is unlikely that he will be afforded the same level of freedom to voice his displeasure as he previously was. Moreover, I think that if he has problems at Souths, he will forever be condemned as being a rogue and a trouble-maker, with Taylor's decision to get rid of him being fully justified.
Oi alien, R95, SOUTHS till I die, etc......
Next to re-sign Madge.
Daily Telegraph have said that's next on our list.
Good on Richo.
I'd lock in Madge on an extension for 2018 & 2019.
True but I'd like us to keep Madge.What's the rush? We already have him for next year. They might wait and see how we go in the first 2 months of the season.
True but I'd like us to keep Madge.
I think he's a very very good coach.
I'd do 2 more years.Yeah I'd probably extend the contract by 1 more year at this stage.
Its a good piece of business because a lot of coaches in the competition are going to be under pressure in 2017 and Madge will no doubt be an appealing option for many. Also, if worst comes to worst and Madge has a horrendous 2017 season, we can part ways with him and just pay him the money that he is owed. Remember, coaches' salaries are not included under the cap and we are not exactly struggling for money.I'd do 2 more years.
Madge will want security too. We can't muck him around and he doesn't deserve that after what he's done for us.
We have made the Finals 4 out of 5 years since he has been coach. 3 of those years top 4. 1 Premiership, 1 World Club Championship, 1 Nines Championship. He deserves another go in 2017, and if we make the Finals again then he should probably be here in 2018.
2015 we still made 7th. That's solid.Hes done a few things for us, but the last two years have been very ordinary. Sometimes coaches get stale. Nothing personal. No long contract 4 Madge, a couple of good games at the backend of the season doesnt make me sing too much. I say no contract.
We should at least try to snap up Matthew Elliot and/or Griffin, Stuart or Henry as options beyond 2017.