Chipmunk
Coach
- Messages
- 16,314
He appeared to be in the team for nothing but his defence. I suppose his support play was a factor as well.
The team leading the comp has been playing a 6 just there for his defence.
He appeared to be in the team for nothing but his defence. I suppose his support play was a factor as well.
Probably because we had all the ball. Our right side attack made plenty of metres but nothing was created on that side. I rate Will Smith as an attacking player but tonight it looked like Kelly without the kicking game.
I suppose his size will always be a problem in that regard but some of the misses might be due to the fatigue from playing longer minutes, which could in theory improve.He does lead our missed tackle count for the year regardless (he has 36)....9 is high and maybe the head knock didn't help but he's missing rather a few even when he's not iffy in the head.
I suppose his size will always be a problem in that regard but some of the misses might be due to the fatigue from playing longer minutes, which could in theory improve.
Our right side is less potent anyway. With Norman and Gutherson mostly playing left, and Jennings having a blinder, do you really think it's because of Will Smith that we didn't create a lot on the right?
Or is that we went left in genuine attacking situations because it was stacked with our high quality attackers?
Nathan Brown is playing really well,better player than i thought he would be
Munster? You're off your f**ken head merkinThe team leading the comp has been playing a 6 just there for his defence.
I know why our right side offers little. My point was it was no better tonight than when Kelly played there.Our right side is less potent anyway. With Norman and Gutherson mostly playing left, and Jennings having a blinder, do you really think it's because of Will Smith that we didn't create a lot on the right?
Or is that we went left in genuine attacking situations because it was stacked with our high quality attackers?
He's an impact player. Always was.I think his size counts against him being an 80 minute player and maintaining impact. It's just too much to ask him to tackle 120kg blokes for 80 mins every week IMO.
And I don't think his defence is that great to begin with either, probably mostly due to his size. He's got plenty of ticker but I think starting 80 minute hooker in the NRL is beyond him.
Munster? You're off your f**ken head merkin
I think you're probably right which the reports of us chasing a hooker suggest. But we've proved we can win games with him in the team so it's not all doom and gloom.I think his size counts against him being an 80 minute player and maintaining impact. It's just too much to ask him to tackle 120kg blokes for 80 mins every week IMO.
And I don't think his defence is that great to begin with either, probably mostly due to his size. He's got plenty of ticker but I think starting 80 minute hooker in the NRL is beyond him.
I know why our right side offers little. My point was it was no better tonight than when Kelly played there.
Yeah, that was good. And probably highlights what we've been missing from dh. I even had a mad thought at the time about converting Jenko to hooker.Jennings set up two tries from dummy half tonight, which was more about the disintegration of the Cowboys play the ball defence in the middle, rather than our left side attack.
Yeah, that was good. And probably highlights what we've been missing from dh. I even had a mad thought at the time about converting Jenko to hooker.
And without the passes over the sideline TBH.Probably because we had all the ball. Our right side attack made plenty of metres but nothing was created on that side. I rate Will Smith as an attacking player but tonight it looked like Kelly without the kicking game.
And without the passes over the sideline TBH.