Hook is where x-factor goes to die.
In 7 years as head coach not a single half has played their best footy under Hook. Not to say they havent been decent under him. But like clockwork they go and improve under a new coach that lets them use their ability. Corey Normsn is onr of the best examples of that. He looked to have no vision or x-factor under Hook. 12 months away from him and he's actually a decent player. Scummy human. But decent player.
Nathan is only 20 years old and until a fortnight ago had spent his entire NRL career under a coach who didnt want his players backing themselves.
In 2 weeks he has already began running more and having a variety of kicks up his sleeve. We still have no game plans or set plays as such to execute though. He's a player who will do exactly what his coach wants. Put him under a Bellamy or Bennett and he goes on to have a Cronk like career. Bennett would do wonders for a number of our players.
To blame it all on hook needs another explanation for Cleary doing nothing attacking wise in the origin series. Not even in the dead rubber when the pressure was off did he show glimpses.
Cleary’s age also isn’t the issue, far more relevant is his experience. He’s played 54 FG games, this is the point he should be improving.
Cleary isn’t a bad player, he’s just not a good halfback. If he’s always going to follow instructions & not play what’s in front of him he’ll never make the step up. Cleary himself has talked about needing to play what’s in front of him, Fittler said it during game 3, but he hasn’t been able to execute that.
Our best phase of the season was actually when Cleary was out of the team. We went 5-2 without him.
Perhaps if we got Bellamy or Bennett to the club, but what’s the chances of that? You’d be mad to pay Nathan Cleary $1m a season.