Ghoulies
Bench
- Messages
- 3,948
It's possible that HBO's CEO of tits stepped in to ensure the boob quota was filled, but I'd assume in most scenes creative control rests with the writers and the director.Springs said:Who says the writers do? As you know, HBO has a perv producer who forces them to put nudity in. It was the boob quota of the week.
Message? Yes. Effect? Probably not. I'm pretty desensitised to most forms of violence in pop culture, but actually showing the rape brings out a visceral reaction of disgust for me.Would the scene have had the same message and effect without casual background rape and boob shots? Yes.
That's not to say writers should have a carte blanche to just throw in some rape whenever they feel like shocking an audience, but showing it does achieve something that merely suggesting it doesn't.
Well that's probably historically accurate, which is strange considering how almost everything else in the rest of those movies are not.Springs said:There was a similar scene in the latest 300 movie. During the sack of Athens there were a bunch of women being raped for no reason at all.
It's a sensitive issue. I guess he felt the need to point it out so no one accuses him of being a rape apologist.Springs said:Umina hates rape...well uh, duh? If he didn't hate it that would be a little disturbing wouldn't it?
Well I think the fact that they're naked makes the rape that much more graphic, so if your intention is to horrify, then yeah there's a reason to show it.Springs said:I'm not saying it's exactly the same as the brothel scenes. The point is if there's rape there's no reason to focus on the naked, bouncing breasts of the woman. That part is simply gratuitous, as they showed last episode they can have the same effect with clothed rape. Even if the woman has to be naked, there's no reason for there to be a close-up on her naked body.
