Ok, so this is probably a reason why someone like Nick Politis no longer bothers sponsoring the Roosters in anyway, as he could potentially just give them a car worth an unlimited amount of money and it will have nothing to do with the cap.
What is the point in actually having businesses sponsor your club then? Surely you are just better off having them "sponsor" your players then.
Is this new "Premiership Club" to be headed by the Macquarie Bank guy some sort of outlet to get Third Party Sponsors?
Bingo. You hear players from, say, Sharks saying that they don't have the big money like Roosters, Eels or Dogs. On the surface that doesn't make sense, seeing that the NRL pays the clubs the whole of their NRL cap. Beyond that, the well connected clubs will conjure up 3rd party deals on top of the the registered NRL contract.
The problem with this however, is players like Fafita read the small print to see that 50% of their "salary" is 3rd party AND that they club does not guarantee payment. Accordingly, scenarios of Gasnier and in RU Matt Giteau can get shafted when 3rd party deals are not honoured.
IIRC there was a 3rd party deal with Hayne's current contract that went sour. I assume that the problem was quickly resolved.
Star fullback Jarryd Hayne has been short-handed $200,000 by the Parramatta Eels, after the club failed to honour a series of third-party payments.
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/p...00-out-of-pocket-after-contract-breach-2014-3
The above is erroneous of course because any 3rd party deal is supposed to be arranged by a players manager and not the club.
The farce of course is that all 3rd party deals are arranged by the clubs, yet somehow the NRL turn a blind eye to this.