Exactly Bird decided to go and Adam Gerard-Tuimavave wanted to come to the club. So get behind Adam and don't worry about Jack. He is now a Shark.
I have heard some Warriors fans speak highly of Adam just like some here speak of Bird. Time will tell who is the better player.
Bird and Hastings were/are dissatisfied junior Dragons. They both made their feelings public and were offered and accepted contracts with other Clubs who seized the opportunity to snap up promising juniors.
Our Club needs to investigate the circumstances related to the non-retension of these players and put in place policy that wll LIMIT such situations happening in the future. Our Club spends a lot of money each year developing juniors and so, we should be able to keep the players we want to keep.
I don't know all the facts however from what I understand, Hastings was always going to go to the Roosters (mainly due to his father?s connection to that Club) and so, he should have be let go much earlier in his development years. This would make way for a more loyal and highly talanted Dragon's junior.
Bird had off field problems regarding support for his family and experienced very tough times. He asked his Club for help and was denied the assistance he needed. Surely a solution could have been found to help him and his family; even if it included provisions for repayment in later years.
Bird and Hastings were/are dissatisfied junior Dragons. They both made their feelings public and were offered and accepted contracts with other Clubs who seized the opportunity to snap up promising juniors.
Our Club needs to investigate the circumstances related to the non-retension of these players and put in place policy that wll LIMIT such situations happening in the future. Our Club spends a lot of money each year developing juniors and so, we should be able to keep the players we want to keep.
I don't know all the facts however from what I understand, Hastings was always going to go to the Roosters (mainly due to his father?s connection to that Club) and so, he should have be let go much earlier in his development years. This would make way for a more loyal and highly talanted Dragon's junior.
Bird had off field problems regarding support for his family and experienced very tough times. He asked his Club for help and was denied the assistance he needed. Surely a solution could have been found to help him and his family; even if it included provisions for repayment in later years.
It appears you rarely do.
No actually, he is normally on the mark .
Very astute and loyal supporter.
Sometimes players get offers they can't refuse
An example may be ....a parent may have a business that suffers some "bad investment decisions" and the offer the son receives may wipe out said debt thus obliging the player to take a juicier contract more on promise than current ability.
The draw of the club your Dad was a legend at is very strong too.
Sometimes players get offers they can't refuse
An example may be ....a parent may have a business that suffers some "bad investment decisions" and the offer the son receives may wipe out said debt thus obliging the player to take a juicier contract more on promise than current ability.
The draw of the club your Dad was a legend at is very strong too.
Tuimavave Gerrard has the better frame for the position we want one of them to play. He has the skill and talent to be a success just needs to add some size. If we wanted bird for the backline we have plenty coming through like aitken, Runciman, Thompson and Dufty to fill that role.
I love reading your posts possm, it's way more exciting to read than the usual safety first garb from myself included. You are as passionate a supporter as any and nobody can tell you what you can or can't say. I always read your posts, always and you are usually on the money about the issues at hand.;-)
Bird and Hastings were/are dissatisfied junior Dragons. They both made their feelings public and were offered and accepted contracts with other Clubs who seized the opportunity to snap up promising juniors.
Our Club needs to investigate the circumstances related to the non-retension of these players and put in place policy that wll LIMIT such situations happening in the future. Our Club spends a lot of money each year developing juniors and so, we should be able to keep the players we want to keep.
I don't know all the facts however from what I understand, Hastings was always going to go to the Roosters (mainly due to his father?s connection to that Club) and so, he should have be let go much earlier in his development years. This would make way for a more loyal and highly talanted Dragon's junior.
Bird had off field problems regarding support for his family and experienced very tough times. He asked his Club for help and was denied the assistance he needed. Surely a solution could have been found to help him and his family; even if it included provisions for repayment in later years.
I love reading your posts possm, it's way more exciting to read than the usual safety first garb from myself included. You are as passionate a supporter as any and nobody can tell you what you can or can't say. I always read your posts, always and you are usually on the money about the issues at hand.;-)
fmd it's a love in.:sarcasm::sarcasm:
Warm fuzzy feeling Bottle..
Feel free to spread the love...![]()
Weren't you leaving a week ago? Good to see you stick to your convictions lol.
Weren't you leaving a week ago? Good to see you stick to your convictions lol.
No actually, he is normally on the mark .
Very astute and loyal supporter.