What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Decisions That Changed Finals

Canard

Immortal
Messages
37,255
It was Ricko, champ. Pimp slapped him into next week.

And you got the sook wrong. The clock doesn’t stop for knock ons in league. The sook is that the rooster who dove on the knock on may have been offside, which would have resulted in a penalty and 1 final play for the cows.


Oh, and I thought of another one!

2004 prelim, Cowboys vs roosters.

Minutes before halftime, LOD blindsides Crocker with the mother of all dog shots, so far off the ball that cameras didn’t pick up on it.

A touchie saw the incident - as did everyone on the eastern concourse - but LOD somehow escaped with only being placed on report.

Luckily, justice prevailed that day

The memory is getting shit. I remember "noted" tough guy Morley backing down like a mongrel dog when Rauhihi shaped up to him. But yes very dodgy call. I still remember Simpkins impotently telling Rauhihi he was going to send him off as the buzzer sounded.

As for the late gut, It was "noted" tough guy Croker though so no-one gave a f**k.
 
Last edited:

Valheru

Referee
Messages
20,470
2004 Semi, Cowboys trail Roosters by 3 points with minutes to go, Cowboys put up a bomb Mini spills it and Simpkins let's the clock run out??? This was after him letting Fletcher punch Fein in the head in front of the posts and do nothing.

Only one team was allowed to win that day.

You were unlikely to score even with one more play but i guess that is more legitimate than the epic sook JT had in 2014 due to a 100% correct knock on decision.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,098
The memory is getting shit. But yes very dodgy call. I still remember Simpkins impotently telling Rauhihi he was going to send him off as the buzzer sounded

It was "noted" tough guy Croker though so no-one gave a f**k.

I believe the specific wording when simpkins threatened to bin someone as the siren went was something along the lines of “Who f**king cares? The season is over”

Pretty spot on really
 

Springs09

Juniors
Messages
1,903
Or, if you like, Hayne's decision to be a dick and bump Slater as he ran back on side. Ref (correctly) rules Hayne caused the dropped ball. No-one to blame but Payne himself.

lol

Firstly it was Kingston running back onside and secondly Slater sticks his arm out while getting up to play it and hits Kingston running back. There was no intent at all from Kingston to knock the ball out and Slater should have held on to the ball.
 

King hit

Coach
Messages
14,345
You were unlikely to score even with one more play but i guess that is more legitimate than the epic sook JT had in 2014 due to a 100% correct knock on decision.

Thurston didn't complain about that decision and blamed the way they started that game for losing, despite Tallis and the media baiting them. I really liked how the Cowboys behaved after that game.
 

Leigh Howlett

Juniors
Messages
666
The one shining light in a terrible year for me personally was Balmain making the Grand Final, so many what 'if's' that day, Michael Neil being ankle tapped in desperation by Mal, Benny's field goal attempt just failing to go over, Wayne Pearce having a player on his 'blind side', the terrible tackling efforts on John Ferguson in the final minutes.
Then there's the Wok's weird decision to bench Sirro and Blocker but fair dinkum there should have been a Royal Commission into Hollywood giving the Raider the penalty for the McGuire incident, Harrigan's explanation/justification many years later for giving the penalty to the Raiders that it wasn't in the spirit of the game when every other time in that era the penalty went to the attacking side.
Even in this current era when the dummy half goes for a scoot they are trying to catch the markers offside, sometimes it's a penalty situation sometimes the ref's let if go but in 1989 I digress......
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
37,255
You were unlikely to score even with one more play but i guess that is more legitimate than the epic sook JT had in 2014 due to a 100% correct knock on decision.

There was almost no complaint from Cowboys fans or players after that game.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
37,255
The one shining light in a terrible year for me personally was Balmain making the Grand Final, so many what 'if's' that day, Michael Neil being ankle tapped in desperation by Mal, Benny's field goal attempt just failing to go over, Wayne Pearce having a player on his 'blind side', the terrible tackling efforts on John Ferguson in the final minutes.
Then there's the Wok's weird decision to bench Sirro and Blocker but fair dinkum there should have been a Royal Commission into Hollywood giving the Raider the penalty for the McGuire incident, Harrigan's explanation/justification many years later for giving the penalty to the Raiders that it wasn't in the spirit of the game when every other time in that era the penalty went to the attacking side.
Even in this current era when the dummy half goes for a scoot they are trying to catch the markers offside, sometimes it's a penalty situation sometimes the ref's let if go but in 1989 I digress......

Like I said the OP photos appear to show a Balmain player in an offside position when McGuire tapped it 6 of one, half a dozen of the other
 
Last edited:

no name

Referee
Messages
20,976
Like I said the OP photos appear to show a Balmain player in an offside position when McGuire so 6 of one, half a dozen of the other
That makes it interesting.
However, Harrigan specifically ruled ‘against the spirit of the game’ which is absolute bs.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
37,255
That makes it interesting.
However, Harrigan specifically ruled ‘against the spirit of the game’ which is absolute bs.

He said he did later, and I agree that's spurious, but I'm inclined to the decision resulted in a just outcome anyway.
 

King hit

Coach
Messages
14,345
There was almost no complaint from Cowboys fans or players after that game.

Not from supporters apart from the knowledgeable ones. My Facebook was clogged with calls of corruption and match fixing after that game.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
37,255
Not from supporters apart from the knowledgeable ones. My Facebook was clogged with calls of corruption and match fixing after that game.

Find me an NRL game, let alone a finals that isn't clogged with "we wuzz robbed" on lowest common denominator shit like Facebook
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
37,255
He played it forward, it wasnt a tap. A player can be infront of him as it was considered a play the ball.

In 110 years of league this is literally the only time that incident was ruled that way.

You still weren't allowed to play it forward, or play the ball,whilst one of your players was offside (technically).

I think we can all agree that Harrigan just made that "spirit of the game" BS up years later and the and he really ruled that McGuire wasn't able to tap it forward as there was a market (which was not correct)
 

Vic Mackey

Referee
Messages
26,863
You still weren't allowed to play it forward, or play the ball,whilst one of your players was offside (technically).

I think we can all agree that Harrigan just made that "spirit of the game" BS up years later and the and he really ruled that McGuire wasn't able to tap it forward as there was a market (which was not correct)

Huh? If that’s the case then every first tackle after a kick wouldn’t be allowed?
 
Top