perhaps of the Boondock variety...Yes, and TBH you have been quite confrontational at times. I of course have been a saint.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
perhaps of the Boondock variety...Yes, and TBH you have been quite confrontational at times. I of course have been a saint.
OK you win the award for the most obscure reference of the week. A 1.5
movie that grossed $20k in the US box office. 
I graciously accept.OK you win the award for the most obscure reference of the week. A 1.5
View attachment 66230
genuinely don't know - will know by about 8:15
Did OK on video thoughOK you win the award for the most obscure reference of the week. A 1.5
View attachment 66230
Your Honour
I reckon if BA has an expressionless look on his face at half time we are around about a 50% chance of winning.
Jake came on after we had finsished scoring our tries and we conceded two with him there
www.nrl.com
None of those blokes think he is currently up to NRL standard - despite the fact that he is a "great kid"
You obviously weren’t thinking of loser baby. Look at all that bread ffs!
I didn’t even need to turn my head sideways. Like Pavlov’s dog, I wondered why I had started salivating.
We know he accumulates off field distractions. It wouldn’t be the first time he’s fallen out of favour at an NRL club.
Well since you like to dress your speech up with big words and correct grammar I assumed you were smart enough to accept that nobody is accusing you of blaming Jake Arthur for our losses. The only logical criticism is that his selection is taking away from a more deserving (and useful) spine-type player, who could only be Bryce Cartwright.
