baggygreen man
Bench
- Messages
- 4,394
No seems CA may have. Bloody baffling. was he picked simply for net bowling in last Test. If so a kick in the guts for the West Aussie.You've abandoned your mate Feathers Morris already Baggers?
No seems CA may have. Bloody baffling. was he picked simply for net bowling in last Test. If so a kick in the guts for the West Aussie.You've abandoned your mate Feathers Morris already Baggers?
Guys, Hazlewood is the incumbent with a fine record behind him. That alone should get him the nod. But two selectors are Vics so George Bailey may be out voted.And he has been spectacular since.
No, Boland is the incumbent.Guys, Hazlewood is the incumbent with a fine record behind him. That alone should get him the nod. But two selectors are Vics so George Bailey may be out voted.
Figured when Mark Waugh was sacked that bias selections went with him. What a fool.
What kick in the guts? He was picked in the squad, other bowlers were deemed better than him.No seems CA may have. Bloody baffling. was he picked simply for net bowling in last Test. If so a kick in the guts for the West Aussie.
If it hadn't been for Hazes injury last year Barrell would still be laboring in state cricket. He got lucky to bowl on a lively MCG wicket. Who is not to say that the superior seamer of the two would have taken similar wickets if he played . Besides the Tamworth boy is the incumbent so if fit he must play.
I like being the odd one out. Sometimes gets me into strife tho.
Home town wicket for Boland. And Haze comes back in for the SCG.
Start one Baggers.We should have a junior cricket thread. Too cerebral for you blokes.