- Messages
- 7,178
Are you going to answer my question? How can you criticize the USARL for clubs not having an 'equal say' when there's no genuine outlet for clubs in the AMNRL to have any say at all? What evidence do you have to suggest that USARL clubs won't have an equal say, given that there is a clearly outlined democratic process in place? What procedures does the AMNRL have in place for people who disagree with Niu? Other than blacklisting and removing all ties with them of course.All the clubs were invited to a meeting to explain Star Groups role and an update on the speculation of a pro league. This took place a year ago. Everybody got invited.
Logos - clubs were encouraged to work with Star to make their logos. Becasue some clubs started pushing in other directions David decided the clubs could do their own thing.
,
Also, questions were not asked in December - a letter demanding David Nius resignation was sent in Decemeber. Prior to that there was no asking.
Its comical. Its like a poor kid saying "Who is this rich uncle and why is he helping us. How dare he!" I honestly could not see a problem. If you wanted their help it was there, if not fine.
PS if you really think Pittsburgh or DC will have the same say as Jacksonville or New Haven then you really are naive.
Last edited: