spartan2153
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,376
The board didn't think he could change the culture at the club.
The difference is, Kearney's well respected, with a big profile in the game. Anderson was seen by most as a bit of a nomad, without the commanding presence of Kearney.
Basically, Kearney was seen as having a lot more potential than Anderson.
Either that or the board thought they'd be more chance of being voted back in by sacking a good coach and replacing him with a shit one. :roll:
So is Ricky stuart.