Chook Norris
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,322
Disagree. If a player wants to play international rugby, in a meaningful comp, union is the game for them. Union have been apparently threatening to take all the good stars for years without great success. For every Ashton and Robinson you have the Farrells, the Chev Walkers, the Lee Smiths, expensive failures for the RFU. International League is poor. I wish it wasn't, but the truth is only two teams are competitive with one showing promise from time to time. Dubious residency/ancestry allowances spreads the talent thin, but the game simply isn't big enough outside NSW, Queensland, Yorkshire and Lancashire to be a world game.
Even if hypothetically England win the next 3 international comps - that's still the unfortunate truth. They said Eastmond leaving Saints for Union was a disaster. Then Saints fielded Lomax and Gaskill and everyone forgot about him. Take one star player from every ESL team, put him in a Union team - the game still survives and provides good talent.
So i'll be right behind england on saturday, but the result matters little for the state of the game in the UK
is that an attitude that is ready to accept defeat this weekend? Yes, the ESL has managed to survive without England winning a major tournament over the past 30 years but you're kidding if you don't think it wouldn't leave any sort of noticeable impact on the English game. When standards of the international game rise of course you're going to see a rise in the quality of the domestic comp. If England have any sort of major success against Australia that subsequent method or style of play would want to be emulated within the domestic ranks