What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ben Teo Facing 3-4 weeks

gronkathon

First Grade
Messages
9,266
I would have though 2 weeks considering everything.

The question should be asked though that if Teo with a cleaner record is looking at three weeks for a first incident why was he not sent? Will Hollywood explain this or hide behind hyperbole as usual?
 
Messages
33,280
Joke that some people get suspended while others get away with then those who actually do suspended get more than the other guy.

I would have though 2 weeks considering everything.

The question should be asked though that if Teo with a cleaner record is looking at three weeks for a first incident why was he not sent? Will Hollywood explain this or hide behind hyperbole as usual?

Yeah and I bet you thought the shot on JWH was legit. No difference, both shoulders attacking the head except this charge on Te'o confirms that the rules don't apply when the game is on the line.
 

gronkathon

First Grade
Messages
9,266
Joke that some people get suspended while others get away with then those who actually do suspended get more than the other guy.



Yeah and I bet you thought the shot on JWH was legit. No difference, both shoulders attacking the head except this charge on Te'o confirms that the rules don't apply when the game is on the line.

Rarely any rules apply when the game is on the line.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,789
People need to learn you can't hit the head. Intent is irrelevant. Getting brain damage later in life has nothing to do with whether you were hit in the head on purpose or accidentally.

If you attempt a shoulder charge you do it knowing you're risking time on the sideline if you do it wrong.

Aim 10cm lower or quit doing it. Simple enough.
 

juanfarkall

Coach
Messages
10,073
People need to learn you can't hit the head. Intent is irrelevant. Getting brain damage later in life has nothing to do with whether you were hit in the head on purpose or accidentally.

If you attempt a shoulder charge you do it knowing you're risking time on the sideline if you do it wrong.

Aim 10cm lower or quit doing it. Simple enough.

What age were you when you were first shouldercharged ?
 

The Gambler

Juniors
Messages
2,316
I don't understand - how can anyone not think it was dangerous conduct?

Section 15 of the NRL rules quite clearly states that any contact with the head, whether intentional, reckless or careless - it misconduct.

Doesn't get much clearer than that.
 
Messages
545
Personally I don't think he deserves 3-4 weeks maybe 1-2. I would say he hit Groat on the chin and knocked him out. Still think the Tigers should have been allowed to call on another player for Groat after he was ko'd.

I wish we went away from interchange all together and had subs like the old days, once you were replaced you were off the field for good.
 

S.S.T.I.D

Bench
Messages
3,641
To me, accidental contact with the shoulder is no different to accidental contact with the head. Both are just part of the dangerous aspect of the game and, unless we outlaw shoulder charges (which would be a farce and partially destroy the fabric of the game), will continue to be part of the game. As a part of the body that is fixed in position it is almost impossible to time an intentional shoulder to the head.

It was just a brutal rugby league tackle and part of the reason that we love to watch and play the game.
 

jonno_knights

Juniors
Messages
2,228
3-4 weeks for Te'o, but 1 week for Quinn who not only made contact with Sau's head with the shoulder in an earlier tackle, but also carried out pretty bad tackle making contact flush with the jaw, with a swinging arm, both feet off the ground and rushing out of the line to hit a player who didnt even have the ball.

Judiciary continues to bamboozle me.
 
Messages
15,893
I don't understand - how can anyone not think it was dangerous conduct?

Section 15 of the NRL rules quite clearly states that any contact with the head, whether intentional, reckless or careless - it misconduct.

Doesn't get much clearer than that.

Agree, he clocked him in the head, that's a penalty every day of the year, regardless of intent. If you go for a shoulder charge and get it wrong you are going to spend time on the sideline.
 
Top