What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. C

    WA BEARS

    You still understand your logical conclusion don’t you? Darwinism means death of the weak that’s how it works. Put him in reserve grade and we can both watch better games
  2. C

    WA BEARS

    Well there you go. May as well follow through with my idea then. Create a Premier League
  3. C

    WA BEARS

    You mean promotion and relegation. You get all your areas with representation, meaningful games for the teams on the bottom and no 50 point floggings every week
  4. C

    WA BEARS

    Haha nihilism. Thanks Nietzsche.
  5. C

    WA BEARS

    22 sides across two competitions? No thanks
  6. C

    WA BEARS

    Mate there are a whole bunch of clubs that are irrelevant now.
  7. C

    WA BEARS

    You don’t know what a strawman is then. What I am doing is called a divergence. Look, I believed like you did in expansion but upon serious reflection the competition is simply not good enough at the moment and you would be just making the same mistakes of thirty years ago where some teams would...
  8. C

    WA BEARS

    And make the competition a pseudo reserve grade competition in the process?
  9. C

    WA BEARS

    It wouldn’t matter who coached the Raiders. We ain’t winning a competition either way so continue playing a strawman.
  10. C

    WA BEARS

    Haha so you don’t believe in darwanism then. Btw have you actually worked out that in this scenario that I am pitching to everybody, these clubs aren’t dying in a literal sense they are just moving to a competition that is befitting to their standard. I am actually making this a competition for...
  11. C

    WA BEARS

    Depends on who you cut. Supporters would gravitate to new clubs or follow them in reserve grade.
  12. C

    WA BEARS

    Be constructive for once
  13. C

    WA BEARS

    Well it depends on what you define as success. There are teams that at best will make a finals series and that is the best they can hope to achieve. So it is not a question of teams being losers every now and then; it is a question of whether any team could win. I think there are a few sides...
  14. C

    WA BEARS

    Most definitely my own side. We aren’t winning a competition ever again so I’d be happy with NSW Cup. It helps the broader competition as well. Btw I am just taking the logic of your argument MugaB to its inevitable conclusion. As you have pointed out IF you want Darwinism (i.e. the strong...
  15. C

    WA BEARS

    That simply doesn’t make sense though from a logical standpoint though. Why persist with poorly run or irrelevant teams for the hell of it. It makes the competition weaker by inference.
  16. C

    WA BEARS

    So you don’t believe in creating a better standard of competition?
  17. C

    WA BEARS

    Mate there has been a steady increase in lopsided results over the past 5 years. There have been literally three teams that have dominated the competition for the past quarter of a century. The trend has been going that way for a long time - you may as well formalise the process and get on with...
  18. C

    WA BEARS

    I’m in my 30’s so probably younger than you
  19. C

    WA BEARS

    Your post doesn’t make sense. You are worried about ‘supporters’ create a better competition and put teams that can actually compete.
  20. C

    WA BEARS

    Only one of us has ever followed the fumblers. What I have said is pretty much on the money. You can’t argue it if you like.

Latest posts

Top