08 :: R4 Sat :: Titans 32 Raiders 12 @ Skilled

[bileduct]

That is a f**king disgraceful call.

The video ref AT WORST for the Raiders could only give benefit of the doubt.

However, the fact is the touchjudge was RIGHT ON THE f**kING SPOT in the best position to see the ball and didn't raise his flag.

Absolute bullsh*t.

 

[Spike]

Halftime 10-6 Titans

 

[Big Pete]

:lol:

And Trent didn't know what I was going on about.

 

[Big Pete]

Half Time

Gold Coast Titans 10
Tries: Luke Bailey, Luke O'Dwyer
Goals: Scott Prince (1/2)

Canberra Raiders 6
Tries: Colin Best
Goals: Todd Carney (1/1)

 

[Bicey_18]

That is a f**king disgraceful call.

The video ref AT WORST for the Raiders could only give benefit of the doubt.

However, the fact is the touchjudge was RIGHT ON THE f**kING SPOT in the best position to see the ball and didn't raise his flag.

Absolute bullsh*t.

Correct call... foot was clearly on the line

 

[juneauquan]

Awful, awful, awful, awful, awful, awful, awful, awful, awful call against the Raiders to be denied the try.

The Touch judge was right there and had easily the best view of that call. To go against the Touch Judge was absolutely awful.

 

[Big Pete]

Since when did the fans more or less the other officials take the touch judges seriously? :lol:

 

[bileduct]

Correct call... foot was clearly on the line

That's absolute bullsh*t Bicey and you know it.

There is no clear decision that could be made from the footage presented, but that fact is that the touch judge was less than two meters away, was staring right at Best's foot and didn't raise his flag.

Absolute bullsh*t.

 

[Sood]

Yeh i thought his foot was on the line..

 

[WarriorsFan4Life]

That is a f**king disgraceful call.

The video ref AT WORST for the Raiders could only give benefit of the doubt.

However, the fact is the touchjudge was RIGHT ON THE f**kING SPOT in the best position to see the ball and didn't raise his flag.

Absolute bullsh*t.

I totally agree!, that was a crap call by the video ref from two blurred images when the feckin touchie had the easiest call he''ll ever make. Should've been benefit of the doubt. F**K!!!.

:crazy:

 

[Bicey_18]

That's absolute bullsh*t Bicey and you know it.

There is no clear decision that could be made from the footage presented, but that fact is that the touch judge was less than two meters away, was staring right at Best's foot and didn't raise his flag.

Absolute bullsh*t.

That last angle showed his foot on the line...

 

[Spike]

Foot was on the line, correct call.

 

[bileduct]

That last angle showed his foot on the line...

No it doesn't.

The camera is panning from right to left at such a rate that the white line is clearly blurred between two frames.

At worst this is a benefit of the doubt decision.

If that's no try then there's no f**king point of having touch judges in game. None whatsoever.

 

[Bicey_18]

Of course your going to say otherwise... it was your team that got denied.

 

[juneauquan]

That last angle showed his foot on the line...

I'm sorry, I believe the Touch Judge who was right there rather than a video ANGLE that can be deceiving to the eyes of the ignorant

 

[bileduct]

Of course your going to say otherwise... it was your team that got denied.

I'm not the only one saying it, nobhead.

I could clearly say that of course you and Spike would say otherwise considering your hatred of the Raiders.

 

[Bicey_18]

And we all know how reliable touchies are....

 

[juneauquan]

Of course your going to say otherwise... it was your team that got denied.

Well your theory is shot since I don't support the Raiders

 

[Bicey_18]

I'm not the only one saying it, nobhead.

I could clearly say that of course you and Spike would say otherwise considering your hatred of the Raiders.

Cry me a river...

 

[juneauquan]

And we all know how reliable touchies are....

I would rather trust an 'unreliable' touchie who is right there rather than an 'unreliable' video angle