09 :: R19 Mon :: Eels 18 Storm 16 @ Parramatta

[Noa]

Chambers needed to take Hayne towards the side-line then to take him out of the play.

 

[Ianc]

Refs are really inconsistent when it comes to penalising dissent.

BTW Hayne is a cat.

 

[Noa]

WTF.

Catch and Pass you meatheads.

 

[Bazal]

Horrible penalty against Hindmarsh, the Storm are still alive

 

[Bazal]

Oh joy, Storm have scored off another atrocious call. We deadset can't take a trick lately...

 

[RufusRex]

what a rort

 

[Noa]

Now why cant u you start like that

 

[Timmah]

If that's not obstruction, what is anymore? :x

 

[aussies1st]

Good finish we have here now.

 

[RufusRex]

dont mind the result ... good for StGeorge ... but that was a rort a thon against the eels

 

[Noa]

If that's not obstruction, what is anymore? :x

Off to the toilet, I'll let you know.


Gee, Inu sounds like someone pretty unhappy atm.

 

[Butters]

Nice voluntary tackle by Hayne at the end to steal the win from the Storm.

 

[Twizzle]

never in doubt

 

[shear_joy9]

good win for parra

cronk had an absolute shocker.
chambers needs to learn how to pass

 

[Bazal]

Nice voluntary tackle by Hayne at the end to steal the win from the Storm.

:lol: Yeah, the refs were deadset against you :roll:

 

[Noa]

Journeyman ?

He's a one club player you f**ken stupid dumb, f**ken, mother f**ker.

 

[Butters]

:lol: Yeah, the refs were deadset against you :roll:

The last time i checked voluntary tackles were illegal, thus Melbourne were robbed of a penalty right in front of the posts to even the scores and take the game into overtime. And with Melbourne having all the momentum a win in overtime was all but certain if the refs could actually see a f**king voluntary tackle.

 

[Bazal]

The last time i checked voluntary tackles were illegal, thus Melbourne were robbed of a penalty right in front of the posts to even the scores and take the game into overtime. And with Melbourne having all the momentum a win in overtime was all but certain if the refs could actually see a f**king voluntary tackle.

Well I'm pretty sure a knock on is not a knock on off the foot, and tackling a player in the act of kicking is not a penalty, so how about you take those two points and we get rid of those two tries off your score, fair? :roll:

 

[Apey]

If that's not obstruction, what is anymore? :x

What the?

I thought it was a pretty clear-cut try personally. Well, I would have given it anyway - it didn't look to me Inglis purposely ran into him since he wasn't even looking at him, unless he's the master of being subtle. One of those situations where it was a poor read rather than an obstruction imo.

Good for the Knights, but almost would have preferred the tip :lol:

 

[Noa]

What the?

I thought it was a pretty clear-cut try personally. Well, I would have given it anyway - it didn't look to me Inglis purposely ran into him since he wasn't even looking at him, unless he's the master of being subtle. One of those situations where it was a poor read rather than an obstruction imo.

Good for the Knights, but almost would have preferred the tip :lol:

Yeah Id agree with that. If parra scored that try agaisnt us tonight I wouldnt have seen anything wrong with it.