What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'10 | R15 | Sun | Sharks 4-22 Dragons | Toyota

Result: Sharks v Dragons

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .

Rodent

Bench
Messages
4,229
By the way, just for those who think the refs gifted the Dragons another win.....in the Cronulla try, the last pass was forward lol
 

squiddy

Juniors
Messages
1,171
The sharks had 70% territory in the first half and came up with 4 points. They had far more chances, penalties than us and still couldn't do squat. Suck it up and give the dragons some credit


Yeah I will mate - Dragons were awesome in defence and deserved the win - but don't deny the fact Archer made 2 absolutely diabolical decisions which both went against Cronulla and changed momentum plus another 1 or 2 dodgy decisions against the Sharks ( gardner strip and Barret forward pass - look at the line)

Yeah Dragons were great no denying but Archer farked up a great finish - do you think you deserved to win 22- 4 , the commnetators certainly didnt so you might be on your pat malone
 

S.R.

Juniors
Messages
1,307
Ahh so its gone from 'certain try, we was robbed!' to 'benefit of the doubt' now. Look, that wasnt where the game was won and lost anyway, what about gallen dropping it over the line?

Same result d!ckhead.
 

runatme

Bench
Messages
3,356
soward is the biggest bitch in the nrl

and also dragons army contact jenny craig all you fat sh*ts
 

STG-Dragon

Juniors
Messages
1,554
Disagree. Momentum.

Tony Archer scores a try for the Dragons to seal a win he's worked very, very hard for.

:lol: Momentum you are a f**king fool! It was a blatant double movement! Sharks should consider themselves very lucky it wasn't a penalty!
 
Messages
1,830
soward is the biggest bitch in the nrl

and also dragons army contact jenny craig all you fat sh*ts

I'm lol'ing most at you. Your team can't win a game so everybody is a fat merkin. hahaha what a child. runatme? more like take your ball and run home to mommy.
 

S.R.

Juniors
Messages
1,307
:lol: Momentum you are a f**king fool! It was a blatant double movement! Sharks should consider themselves very lucky it wasn't a penalty!

Dragons fans should consider themselves very lucky that it wasn't a try.

End of the day, a penalty to the Dragons or play on, the Sharks were denied a look at a possible try.

I don't give a f*** if a penalty was awarded, the Sharks didn't score in that set after the play the ball anyway.

TRY OR PENALTY. NOT A f**king PLAY THE BALL.
 

Ulysseus

Bench
Messages
3,610
Why is a Canberra fan in here death riding Saints anyway?
Whatever.
Good effort by the Sharks, they brought the same game they brought to the Roosters last week that got them home 42 to 18, but lightning rarely strikes twice.
Rather than bitch about the "calls" which apparently "cost" the Sharks the game (be honest with yourselves here, they had 30 of the first 40 minutes to score more than the 4 points they did), maybe some of the Sharks supporters should be at least happier that they have improved markedly since the 38 to 0 shut out earlier this year.
The Sharks may yet win a few more games if they can approach them all like that one, just a bit more discipline in attack will see them take it to most teams.

On the Saints performance, not as good in the middle as they have been, but personnel is still a bit disjointed, f**king excellent defence though.
 

Ulysseus

Bench
Messages
3,610
On the "suspect" try's, Gallen had hit the ground and lost momentum from most points of view, there appeared to be a second dig there, helping that face along is the 3 people on top of him would have all but ensured that ball had hit the ground, then he moves the legs to promote himself again.
On the Nightingale one, watch it all you want, the arm carryign the ball does not hit the deck at any point, then he takes extensive care to slowly place it on the line, watch it a million times over, that is all you will see, if anything it was a hell of a lot more visible and definitive than Gallen's push hidden under 3 people where you can only see the ball on the line after the initial contact, why should the ref send it upstairs if he thinks there is going to be an unjust try awarded?
 

S.R.

Juniors
Messages
1,307
The Dragons had been worn down and were ripe for the picking until Archer stepped in.
That's all there is to it.
 

S.R.

Juniors
Messages
1,307
On the Nightingale one, watch it all you want, the arm carryign the ball does not hit the deck at any point, then he takes extensive care to slowly place it on the line, watch it a million times over, that is all you will see, if anything it was a hell of a lot more visible and definitive than Gallen's push hidden under 3 people where you can only see the ball on the line after the initial contact, why should the ref send it upstairs if he thinks there is going to be an unjust try awarded?

Nightingale grounded the ball short, then picked it up off the ground and put it on the line. To me, that's a double movement.

Why should the ref send it upstairs if he thinks there is going to be an unjust try awarded? BECAUSE THE BALL WAS ON THE LINE. It deserves to be looked at. If he feels it would be an unjust try, disallow it himself and rule double movement. A play the ball is not even an option.

Ulysseus Credibility = 0
 

STG-Dragon

Juniors
Messages
1,554
On the "suspect" try's, Gallen had hit the ground and lost momentum from most points of view, there appeared to be a second dig there, helping that face along is the 3 people on top of him would have all but ensured that ball had hit the ground, then he moves the legs to promote himself again.
On the Nightingale one, watch it all you want, the arm carryign the ball does not hit the deck at any point, then he takes extensive care to slowly place it on the line, watch it a million times over, that is all you will see, if anything it was a hell of a lot more visible and definitive than Gallen's push hidden under 3 people where you can only see the ball on the line after the initial contact, why should the ref send it upstairs if he thinks there is going to be an unjust try awarded?

I've got Fox IQ and paused it when the ball hit the ground well short! He then slide is left arm with the ball onto the try line a clear double movement and a penalty! I wish they went to the video ref and showed all the angles it would shut up a lot of the idiots in here!
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top