What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,830
“New Zealand is too small to have just one team; there is plenty of talent to unearth.”

Surely nz is too big just for one team ? Lol

Super sowie what a Champion though
 

Matua

First Grade
Messages
5,261
Not sure this a great idea, isn't working that well in rugby, likely wont work in league either. Their target audience are already Warriors fans. Maybe it might work if they all wear red, they call them Mana Tonga, and they mostly Tongan (heritage) players.

TBH, if they did become a reality I'd probably support them as they're likely going to have more NZers playing for them than the Warriors.
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,332
Wonder if kiwi government will offer funding to this bid?!
Christchurch makes most sense to me.
A Government with ACT (the Association of C***s & Tax-avoiders) in it? Nope.

Neoliberals that believe in reducing Government spending are in power right now. No climate for splashing on an NRL team.
 

İzmir Zaferi

Juniors
Messages
61
With the relaunch of under 20's, which was huge for Warriors in NZ I wonder whether the NRL should actually have four teams in NZ.

Auckland, ChristChurch, Wellington, Hamilton?

Doing so would broaden the drawing.

"Sell" these teams to either the Warriors or Aussie teams (or NRL bids).

For instance, the Melbourne Storm may be interested in launching Wellington Storm as a direct feeder. Roosters in Hamilton.

They can preempt and prepare for NRL expansion and create even greater junior pathways that Union can't really match right now.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,893
With the relaunch of under 20's, which was huge for Warriors in NZ I wonder whether the NRL should actually have four teams in NZ.

Auckland, ChristChurch, Wellington, Hamilton?

Doing so would broaden the drawing.

"Sell" these teams to either the Warriors or Aussie teams (or NRL bids).

For instance, the Melbourne Storm may be interested in launching Wellington Storm as a direct feeder. Roosters in Hamilton.

They can preempt and prepare for NRL expansion and create even greater junior pathways that Union can't really match right now.
Some stinky bait
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,639
With the relaunch of under 20's, which was huge for Warriors in NZ I wonder whether the NRL should actually have four teams in NZ.

Auckland, ChristChurch, Wellington, Hamilton?

Doing so would broaden the drawing.

"Sell" these teams to either the Warriors or Aussie teams (or NRL bids).

For instance, the Melbourne Storm may be interested in launching Wellington Storm as a direct feeder. Roosters in Hamilton.

They can preempt and prepare for NRL expansion and create even greater junior pathways that Union can't really match right now.

Never. It's been 30 years since warriors entered comp. Two kiwi teams will probably be limit.
 
Top