Nemesis
Bench
- Messages
- 3,211
Seriously, you are brain dead - end of.Oh the irony....."No comparison".
You are comparing 2009 to 2010.
oh but Issac, we didn't have Issac.
Seriously, you are a bit of a nuffy.
Seriously, you are brain dead - end of.Oh the irony....."No comparison".
You are comparing 2009 to 2010.
oh but Issac, we didn't have Issac.
Seriously, you are a bit of a nuffy.
Seriously, you are brain dead - end of.
You're the joke who breeds contempt with your small man syndrome, timmy.This thread would have to be the biggest example of success breeding contempt. Souths have gone from being the most successful Australian RL club of all time to the joke of the league... with a massive inferiority complex. Little brother syndrome at it's peak.
Yet you're trying to predict the outcome of a game yet to be played in September, based on a 16-13 game result from July. :lol: Good luck to you too!Mate comparing 41-6 in 2009 to 16-13 in 2010 is brain dead.
Good luck tomorrow, may the best side win.
.Bolded phrase below = comparitive question = comparison.
Some of the penalties were very sus and the count favoured the dragons.... e.g the ridiculous one against Burgess for not getting off the tackled player fast enough in a dominant tackle...ffs.
Lang very rarely has a go at refs, but he did after that game. The litany of ref blunders and their impact on the result of games this season are well documented on LU every week.
Yet you're trying to predict the outcome of a game yet to be played in September, based on a 16-13 game result from July. :lol: Good luck to you too!
Pretty sure most of the ire in this thread is being directed towards you, sir.You're the joke who breeds contempt with your small man syndrome, timmy.
So it's fair to say Canberra are bigger chokers then?
According to you, the Dragons have only been in existence for 11 years.
How many Grand Finals have Canberra won or played in during that time?
The years are starting to rack up for Canberra now, 16 years since a Grand Final appearance.
So what makes you think you can demand answers to questions dude? When you manage to ask an intelligent question I may consider answering it, otherwise don't waste my time..
You still didn't answer the question.
50/50 calls always effect results in close games. The ref decisions in that game were certainly a contributing factor in the outcome, not an excuse for the loss..So your still making excuses for the loss?
:lol: Do you really want to start talking about premierships when your abortion of a club has won nada?
I thought it was a reasonable question. Whether you choose to answer it or not is entirely your choice.So what makes you think you can demand answers to questions dude? When you manage to ask an intelligent question I may consider answering it, otherwise don't waste my time.
Yeah. I guess the ref screwed you in all 50uffs close losses. Just keep hiding from the fact that your team wasn't good enough on more than one occasion this season and the position on the ladder indicates that.50/50 calls always effect results in close games. The ref decisions in that game were certainly a contributing factor in the outcome, not an excuse for the loss.
We would certainly be more entitled to rationalise our very narrow loss, as opposed to your full strength team's humiliating 41-6 record thrashing in the previous game.
How stupid of me, I should have realised you were predicting a Souths victory tomorrow, because when you made this comment you were obviously expecting Souths to win...:sarcasm:Just to correct this comment. I haven't tried to predict tomorrow's result at all.
So why didn't you beat us when we were down on troops at Homebush this year?
No sh*t? Surprisingly, it appears to be coming from dragons fans...:sarcasm:Pretty sure most of the ire in this thread is being directed towards you, sir.
So you're a small, fat man then. :lol:Anyway, small man syndrome doesn't fit me remember, haven't you read all the fat jokes going around? :lol:
This Year?, quick question mate, won't the next one be seventeen?
Hell, some people are probably so arrogant that they have to convince themselves by having a sig of "the next one is number 16" in big red letters as a reminder.
So you're a small, fat man then. :lol:
Another embarrassing Stain thread. Can you guys sink any lower?