Timmah said:
:lol:
Again with the selective timeframes.
Overall Souths have 20 premierships, you have 11. Over the entire period of existence, they are better. Right now in 2007, they are playing finals football. The Roosters are flying out.
Bring up the past 18 years, bring up the 11 premiership years (does that make us better than you 8 times, three against you?)... Souths will still have more and achieved more in two less seasons. And they're still playing this weekend.
You have a hard time grasping things don't you.
I'll simplify it for you.
Consider 2002 for a moment as an example...We won the premiership. Souths came second last (just above your club who lost 37 points and came last for cheating). Earlier, you stated that Souths have
always been better than the Roosters. Now, here's the tricky part, and I'm hoping you understand the defenition of "always", because by using it you are insinuating that the Roosters have never finished higher than Souths. Now look back at what i said earlier (it's just up a few lines if you've forgotten pal) about where the respective teams finished and you may want to rethink your ridiculous comments.
For another amazing stat for you, you can add on at least another 11 seasons for the premierships and roughly the last 18 years to that too plus plenty of other seasons where we have finished above Souths and i hope, for your sake, that you can comprehend that Souths by definition have not always been better than the Roosters.
It's really quite simple.
