'12 | Rivalry (#2) R20 | Sat | Rabbitohs 36-14 Dragons | ANZ

[Desert Qlder]

If Young was actually watching where he was going he may have braced himself or moved out of the way. Inglis cannot be held accountable for his not being spatially aware.

To say Young was blindsided is ridiculous, considering Inglis was coming straight upfield as a fullback does.

That said, it was high and as such was penalised accordingly. Depending on loading I think a week is sufficient.

 

[Galeforce]

Surely this is benefit of the doubt.

only to a biased dope.Video was clear, no try:lol:

 

[aussie7798]

Nothing in that tackle. Young fell into Inglis' chest.

Lol Inglis is a dirty fat f**king cheat but even he cant pull his gut over his shoulder

 

[bileduct]

LOL @ the haters who think it was a send off.

Will Young be back in the game, you think?

Why the f**k should Inglis be on the field.

 

[Big Sam]

FFS Some of you blokes must've failed science at school. When two objects come together at great speed the object with the smaller mass will always come off worse.

Pritchard's in Round 1 was far uglier and pre-meditated. GI won't get any more than 2 weeks if he is charged.

And LOL @ all the St Merge douchebags suggesting a send off. He didn't elbow the opposition halfback in the head late!

 

[bileduct]

only to a biased dope.Video was clear, no try:lol:

Yeah, it was sooooooo clear the video ref needed several replays and excessive use of freeze frame. Very, very clear indeed!

 

[BunniesMan]

Inglis - reckles and careless. In strife. Isaac Luke is a class act doing the throat slitting gesture. At least he wasn't trying to break his leg I guess.

Wow. This is disgusting. It was obviously him telling the cameraman to "cut it" as in stop filming him.

The same people who think GI left his feet think Luke made a throat slitting gesture. In other words, people with hallucinations that need to be medicated for their own safety.

 

[bileduct]

The same people who think GI left his feet

Yes dickhead, tell us again how Young wasn't upright as he fell into Inglis' chest. Wanker.

 

[OhWhenTheSaints]

Indeed, when they kept going over the first 2 replays I kept saying to myself "surely this has to be BoTD". However, that last replay I think showed he didn't get it down. They can't give it BoTD just because they spent a month looking at bad angles before getting to a good one.

Well argued point mate. I'll credit that. But next week similar situation and different result AND commentary. Ah well thats footy I suppose.

 

[Ronnie Dobbs]

If Young was actually watching where he was going he may have braced himself or moved out of the way. Inglis cannot be held accountable for his not being spatially aware.

To say Young was blindsided is ridiculous, considering Inglis was coming straight upfield as a fullback does.

That said, it was high and as such was penalised accordingly. Depending on loading I think a week is sufficient.

Of course Inglis is accountable.

He's got a duty of care not to hit him the melon.

Its reckless and careless. The shit storm in the media this week will be tabloid journalism at its worst. I don't think there was malice in it at all. You have to go in hard. But hes definitely accountable for hitting him in the head.

2 or 3 weeks I reckon. More if they want a scapegoat.

 

[Desert Qlder]

Gee Nathan Merrit is a good player.

 

[BDR]

If Young was actually watching where he was going he may have braced himself or moved out of the way. Inglis cannot be held accountable for his not being spatially aware.

To say Young was blindsided is ridiculous, considering Inglis was coming straight upfield as a fullback does.

That said, it was high and as such was penalised accordingly. Depending on loading I think a week is sufficient.

I hope this is a joke. Since when is the impetus on the player being tackled to dodge high tackles?

 

[hunters]

Yeah, it was sooooooo clear the video ref needed several replays and excessive use of freeze frame. Very, very clear indeed!

Bet if the same thing happened to Souths you'd complain that the video ref was looking for a reason to give it. :lol:

 

[BunniesMan]

Yes dickhead, tell us again how Young wasn't upright as he fell into Inglis' chest. Wanker.

So the bloke in the middle of tackling him from behind had absolutely zero effect on his position and Young was about to carry him on his back to the tryline?

 

[Desert Qlder]

Of course Inglis is accountable.

He's got a duty of care not to hit him the melon.

Its reckless and careless. The shit storm in the media this week will be tabloid journalism at its worst. I don't think there was malice in it at all. You have to go in hard. But hes definitely accountable for hitting him in the head.

2 or 3 weeks I reckon. More if they want a scapegoat.

I don't necessarily disagree with you about contact with the head, and you may very well be right in your assessment of his punishment. Not that I think it deserves that.

But I was responding to the moronic 'dog shot' nonsense that was permeating the thread.

 

[Ronnie Dobbs]

Wow. This is disgusting. It was obviously him telling the cameraman to "cut it" as in stop filming him.

The same people who think GI left his feet think Luke made a throat slitting gesture. In other words, people with hallucinations that need to be medicated for their own safety.

:lol::lol:

You'll make detective real soon mate. You are sharp. Sharp as a hypodermic on the block.

 

[Apey]

Do they all just go to the game with the intention of just booing for 80 minutes. f**k me dead

Yes and it's f**king annoying :lol:

When two objects come together at great speed the object with the smaller mass will always come off worse.

The stupidity:crazy:

Really though it was a clear no-try earlier for the Dragons.

Not convinced Inglis should have been sent but lol @ morons who said he was falling. Should get a few weeks.

 

[user_nat]

Merrit should be penalised for kicking the ball away. Least consistently enforced rule ever.

 

[Desert Qlder]

Since when is the impetus on the player being tackled to dodge high tackles?

Why are you asking me that question? I'm not saying they do.

Forget it anyway, too busy watching a good Souths side right now.

 

[Danish]

What's that got to do with anything?

You questioned why I would think an offence worthy of 5 weeks deserves a send off.

The last player to be sent off got 5 weeks.

Can you see what it's got to do with it now or do I need to type even slower?