hunters
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,813
Yeah Burgess should have been sent.....idiot.first burgess with a cheap shot, then inglis on the try line, inglis again how many f**king chances does one team get before a player is sent.
Yeah Burgess should have been sent.....idiot.first burgess with a cheap shot, then inglis on the try line, inglis again how many f**king chances does one team get before a player is sent.
Young with the dive.
Yeah Burgess should have been sent.....idiot.
Haha yeah bias, you've never shown any. :shock:Absolutely embarrassing decision and even more embarrassing levels of bias from these geese in the box
Some of the blatant anti souths bias on here is not funny.
Players getting hit high while dropping and it being put on report happens in almost every game. Noone gets sent for that.
It wasn't a swinging arm, the elbow wasn't sticking out. There was nothing malcicious in it. And GI has a good record.
That's because your club and all of its supporters like you are a disgrace and a bunch of f**kwitsSome of the blatant anti souths bias on here is not funny.
Players getting hit high while dropping and it being put on report happens in almost every game. Noone gets sent for that.
It wasn't a swinging arm, the elbow wasn't sticking out. There was nothing malcicious in it. And GI has a good record.
Yeah Burgess should have been sent.....idiot.
I'd agree with that. There was nothing in it. Clearly nothing malicious intended. No swinging arm, no leading with the elbow. If he doesn't get tackled from behind a fraction of a second before he gets to Inglis he stays upright and GI doesn't touch his head.Talking to a Souths fan and he thinks there was "nothing in the GI hit" and is comparing it to Kasiano
LOL
There was nothing malcicious in it..
Absolutely embarrassing decision and even more embarrassing levels of bias from these geese in the box
That's because your club and all of its supporters like you are a disgrace and a bunch of f**kwits