What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'14 // R2 // Sun // Knights 20-26 Raiders // Hunter

Round 2: Knights v Raiders


  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
All these Newcastle fans spending so much time on here while their frustrated sister waits in bed to get pleasured.

What a horrible and insane world we live in.

You could say the same about the Canberra fans leaving their canines waiting.
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,458
You could try, but it'd really just be stealing someone elses joke and trying to use it as your own.

Which is just sad.
 

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
You could try, but it'd really just be stealing someone elses joke and trying to use it as your own.

Which is just sad.

Yep. That's what's sad here. Not that you support a club that's had to sack a player for having sexual relations with a dog.







*awaits the "at least we don't have a drug problem blah blah blah" cries*
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,458
Your club has had two players incarcerated in the last few years. You were lucky not to have a 3rd, probably could have and should have had a 4th. But no body rang gids.

Your club has had more players involved in ElephantJuice and substance abuse than any other club in the game.

You don't get to fling shit from the incredibly cheap seats about other club's cultures :lol:
 

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
We do when it involves dogs licking people's balls.

:lol: yeah.

We could have our entire squad incarcerated and it still wouldn't put a dent in the amount of humiliation id feel if I were a Canberra supporter after labrador-gate.
 

Walt Flanigan

Referee
Messages
20,727
Lol that says a lot about Newcastle fans really. Thinking that an isolated incident of nut licking is worse than drug dealing and an assault so vicious that it landed the guy 2 years in prison.
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,458
Only a Knights fans could think a dog licking some guys balls for a prank, is worse than some footy thug king hitting a guy for no reason and then stomping his skull in as he laid unconscious.

Goodness me.
 

perverse

Referee
Messages
26,753
Whats worse is you idiots try to defend it, lol. So that's acceptable behaviour down there? f**king weirdos, lol.
 

Swarzey

Bench
Messages
4,165
How on f**king earth can anyone defend the incident? Don't see us defending our f**k ups.

Funny though.
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,458
You're right Perverse, i should instead spend my time accusing the NRL of playing favorites and defending the guy who tries to literally stomp some poor kid out of existence.

Un.
Believable.
 

Walt Flanigan

Referee
Messages
20,727
Whats worse is you idiots try to defend it, lol. So that's acceptable behaviour down there? f**king weirdos, lol.

Who's "defending it"? (apart from Skeepe, who's comment was in obvious jest) It was stupid and disgusting.

But Knights fans saying that it's worse than drug dealing and nearly killing a bloke.......unbelievable.

It's not in the same ball park, and to quote Jules Winnfield, it's not even the same f*cking sport.
 
Last edited:

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
Holy shit, have you guys been ringing Gids?

Did someone actually suggest he would rather have a team full of Russell Packers and Danny Wicks than have a player whose balls were licked by a dog?

Really?

A harmless prank, albeit it in extremely poor taste, is worse than trying to snub some poor guy out of existence for no reason whatsoever?

There's scraping the bottom of the barrel, and then there's Knoughts fans.

Thanks for playing guys... I've seen it all now.
 

perverse

Referee
Messages
26,753
Who's saying anything is worse? I'm just saying it's vile and putrid, much like your club, city and fanbase. You guys are pretty disgusting.
 

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
I'm not one of them, but at least drug use is accepted by some members of society. The incident with the dog was just vile and embarrassing for me as a league fan.

And I cop the incident with Packer was terrible and I'd never try to defend it. However when he'd only been in Newcastle for an extremely short period of time and the NRL hadn't even approved his contract with us yet I think it's reaching a bit to say the Knights culture had anything to do with what Packer did. Unfortunately assault (whether it be physical, sexual or whatever) is too much of an issue game wide. I think his penalty is absolutely fair, but unfortunately I doubt he'd get the same if he played for a Sydney club.
 
Last edited:
Top