'15 | R14 | Fri | WST 34-6 SOU | ANZ

[The Charlatan]

- Your team were perennial strugglers

edited for truth

Edited for truth.

 

[gronkathon]

Read an interesting stat. Tigers have won 2 from the past 11 against Souths. Do you Tigers fans consider Souths to be your bogey side?

Roosters have overtaken Parra recently as our bogey side.

Souths not really considered as yet

 

[Galeforce]

1 GF win in 43 years = struggling. If they bag another one or two in the next 15 years then they're doing alright.

I'm sure you'll refute it with a ":lol:" though.

what a dopey comment , create your own framework and you can change history.

e.g.
1 GF win in 43 years = struggling......perhaps ( better than Sharks, Titans, Warriors, Cowboys
without much thought)
2 GF wins in 44 years = how many clubs worse than this?
5 GF wins in 48 years = better than tigers and most other clubs in the NRL
21 GF in 104 years = better than any other club in the NRL

If this is the best argument you can use for a club which is going alright at the moment then your head spends too much time up your arse.

as for your comment to support that Souths are not popular. Because so many folks knock Souths on LU , LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL , what a classic. I find it funny that so many of you dopes spend more time talking/knocking Souths versus commenting on your own clubs. Why,
I think because most people do not care about your clubs.

 

[alien]

what a dopey comment , create your own framework and you can change history.

e.g.
1 GF win in 43 years = struggling......perhaps ( better than Sharks, Titans, Warriors, Cowboys
without much thought)
2 GF wins in 44 years = how many clubs worse than this?
5 GF wins in 48 years = better than tigers and most other clubs in the NRL
21 GF in 104 years = better than any other club in the NRL

If this is the best argument you can use for a club which is going alright at the moment then your head spends too much time up your arse.

as for your comment to support that Souths are not popular. Because so many folks knock Souths on LU , LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL , what a classic. I find it funny that so many of you dopes spend more time talking/knocking Souths versus commenting on your own clubs. Why,
I think because most people do not care about your clubs.

i was about to post a comment very similar to this but i don't need to now. great post GALEFORCE!!!

 

[my2centsworth]

i was about to post a comment very similar to this but i don't need to now. great post GALEFORCE!!!

And there is only one team who have won the GF in the last year

 

[BunniesMan]

Adam Reynolds is back! We are undefeated in 2015 when he plays.

 

[The Charlatan]

what a dopey comment , create your own framework and you can change history.

e.g.
1 GF win in 43 years = struggling......perhaps ( better than Sharks, Titans, Warriors, Cowboys
without much thought)
2 GF wins in 44 years = how many clubs worse than this?
5 GF wins in 48 years = better than tigers and most other clubs in the NRL
21 GF in 104 years = better than any other club in the NRL

If this is the best argument you can use for a club which is going alright at the moment then your head spends too much time up your arse.

as for your comment to support that Souths are not popular. Because so many folks knock Souths on LU , LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL , what a classic. I find it funny that so many of you dopes spend more time talking/knocking Souths versus commenting on your own clubs. Why,
I think because most people do not care about your clubs.

And you won't find me arguing with the overall statistic that Souths have won the most premierships and therefore have been the most successful. But there is a great divide between premiership 20 and 21, nearly half a century in fact. As with Balmain, Cronulla and Wests, it would qualify Souths as perennial losers. I could quote Balmain as being the most successful club from the inception of the NSWRL until 1920, but I don't because it's not relevant. We're talking about sustained success, something of which Souths (along with other clubs,) have not experienced in a long while.

The point is that you win one grand final, hardly considered sustained success in modern football compared to Brisbane, Manly, Melbourne, Canberra, Canterbury, Easts, Newcastle and Penrith who have all managed to pick up more than one premiership in the last 25 years. You could even lump Parra in with that lot for their dominance in the 80's. Balmain/Wests/WT, Souths, Cronulla, even St. George have done f**k all since the 50's/60's/70's.

Souths don't rate a mention in the modern game. Doesn't stop Souths fans from thinking they are though.

 

[The Charlatan]

i was about to post a comment very similar to this but i don't need to now. great post GALEFORCE!!!

Bullshit you were. You'd replied to the comment already. You're as good a liar as you are loyal.

 

[rabbitohs95]

Adam Reynolds is back! We are undefeated in 2015 when he plays.

Round 4 vs Parra ring a bell?

 

[I Bleed Maroon]

Round 4 vs Parra ring a bell?

:lol: Bunniesmong has a fetish for being proven wrong

 

[Canard]

Going for the classic BM reverse mock.

Tiges have no chance

 

[Canard]

Grevusmhl is a Souths junior now.

Townsville that's in Redfern

 

[Diesel]

Adam Reynolds is back! We are undefeated in 2015 when he plays.

Thanks for the tip, I'll put a 10er on the Tigers

 

[carlosthedwarf]

8pm kick off then

 

[Snappy]

Adam Reynolds is back! We are undefeated in 2015 when he plays.

Round 4 vs Parra ring a bell?

Good ole Petey longface at it again

 

[macnaz]

This will be ugly

 

[I Bleed Maroon]

Typical embarrassing crowd at ANZ.

 

[Nealo 12]

Adam Reynolds is back! We are undefeated in 2015 when he plays.

Oh great another history rewriter

 

[Canard]

Good news for Souths is that they've been playing without Inglis all year.

So it shouldn't be much of an adjustment

 

[tomdl]

So, has channel 9 finally f**ked hadley off for good?