What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'16 | R9 | Sat | SYD 38-0 NEW | Allianz

Round 9: Roosters v Knights


  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .

Jaegerex

Juniors
Messages
1,258
That's a try, it's not a standard second man play, everyone was running straight Pearce was not sliding

The contact even helped turn him towards the ball runner. There was more obstruction to players running from further in field than there was on Pearce.
Unfortunately in this case we have a black and white run, if you make contact don't be expecting to get a try.
 

Unscrupulous

Bench
Messages
2,796
Marker was square. The guy playing the ball dived to the side after playing it. All legal, play on. Refs riding the Roosters hard here.

Firstly the markers aren't allowed to dive on the ball and secondly, the reason it wasn't picked up by a Roosters player is because a f**king Knight was lying in the ruck you stupid f**king genius. Just because your shit team lost.
 

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
32,153
There should be more coaches complaing so far this week we have seen some attrocious decision, what are the NRL going to do fine every coach?
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
46,263
Still, have to feel for the Knights, they're being f**ked harder than Mitchell Pearce on a Jack Russell.
 

Latest posts

Top