The Mad Hatter
Coach
- Messages
- 14,788
By having Perth and Adelaide in a national comp, what ever costs are involved to run them would surely be offset and made up by having a national footprint for TV, marketing, sponsors etc.
By having Perth and Adelaide in a national comp, what ever costs are involved to run them would surely be offset and made up by having a national footprint for TV, marketing, sponsors etc.
In hindsight they probably should never have kicked the Rabbitohs out in the first place and cut a couple of other Sydney clubs... Out of all the Sydney clubs Souths have done the best to grow their fanbase and rely on memberships for revenue rather than Leagues club money. They should get some credit for that.
That's kinda what I was thinking. NRL/News buying the frontier clubs, getting them up to pace then privatising them.
It needed money, and the will to see past the "here and now" to do it, but not utterly impossible.
The NRL couldn't really afford to bank roll clubs at that time, and it would have been hard to convince News to do it if they didn't want to.
Imagine Reds, Rams & Crushers existed from then onwards and had not been folded, maybe NRL would have been throwing money down the pit as AFL has been with GWS & Suns, chances are one or all could have folded some 5 or 10 years later, (RU western force style) which would have probably seen another possible street March in perth or brisbane, or maybe they'd have all been ok, and been able to truck along after a few bail outs (titans style)Good point, and I guess it's easily forgotten just how drained & battle-weary everyone was by the end of 1997.
Hindsight is 20-20, and I guess the key thing was stopping both sides hemorrhaging money in a civil war that could've killed the game altogether.
Good point, and I guess it's easily forgotten just how drained & battle-weary everyone was by the end of 1997.
Hindsight is 20-20, and I guess the key thing was stopping both sides hemorrhaging money in a civil war that could've killed the game altogether.
To be fair somebody did come along and bankroll the Warriors after they folded, so maybe it's not as unlikely that other clubs could have found patrons as well.
reds had a money backer, the addition of reserve grade after they had been accepted screwed their finances and effectively killed the club. That decision drove the club into the arms of SL and the ownership of News Ltd. it made it easy for news ltd to close down the club and move most of it to Melbourne.
Ahh yeah, but that's where self-interest comes (and CONFLICT of interest) comes in.
More big centres & a Brisbane derby probably means bigger price for broadcasting rights.. but News Ltd didn't wanna pay more than they had to.
Easy decision for them to let the Reds, Rams & Crushers die, because they save money twice - no bailout costs, and no mad inflation of TV rights.
ARL wasn't gonna argue for the Reds and Rams because a) they were "traitors" and b) less pressure on the Sydney clubs if the frontier teams die.
Beats me why the ARL didn't fight harder for the Chargers & Crushers though.. even in the face of strong Broncos lobbying for a SEQ monopoly.
So are we just waiting on the TITANS 20 year deal now, right?The reason why the Crushers were folded was because News Ltd made it a clause in the peace deal that there was to be no other teams in SEQ for 20 years.
When that deal ended, we got the Titans nearly to the day.
This argument against another Brisbane team is the same argument we heard from the Broncos when the Gold Coast was being talked about. They'll both be fine.
TWO GAMES IN BRISBANE EVERY WEEK?
How can that happen with only one expansion team
If brisbane broncos play away one week, the Dolphins are at home,
That means Western Corridor or whoever else is also at home.
That to me screams 2 teams in brisbane as expansion, unless he miss-interpreted it, and meant two brisbane clubs playing on tv each week...
Which doesn't really mean much.
But 2 games at Suncorp each week means they are willing to strangle hold brisbane by expanding 2 + clubs.
Freudian slip perhaps?I think he meant to say 1 game every week in Brisbane...
If the Rabbits weren't around somebody else would have taken their place as the big success story.
V'landy's doesn't slip, he isnt peter beattie, if he says we needs 2 games in brisbane every week, its either 2 new expansion clubs there or more sydney teams taking their home games to sumcorp, which i don't see happening other than magic roundFreudian slip perhaps?
NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg has rejected suggestions he and ARL Commission (ARLC) chairman Peter V’landys don’t see eye-to-eye on expansion, but admitted Brisbane is in the “box seat” to get a second team and a final decision will be made before the end of the year.