AlwaysGreen
Post Whore
- Messages
- 50,050
Simple things amuse simple peopleHahahaa
that’s a low blow
Simple things amuse simple peopleHahahaa
that’s a low blow
There's your problem bro. The bears aren't in the NRL. They are an overarching failure.Yes and to run a rugby league club properly costs quite the amount of money and all stuff you’re mentioning doesn’t mean anything to the actual club anyways.
Origin and magic round at Suncorp doesn’t go into the Broncos coffers no more then events in Perth would go into a Perth sides coffers. The government also needs to pay money to be awarded those events to begin with and a lot the money injected goes to local businesses anyways - not directly to the governments accounts. They get a portion sure.
So you’re correct that having an NRL club is beneficial but what’s more beneficial is having an NRL club that can actual self sustain itself.
We are in essence talking about two different things here. Now go back to your economics books.
Geez then you must love cloud watching.Simple things amuse simple people
Business is pretty good. Thanks for your concerns though. Your support is valued.There's your problem bro. The bears aren't in the NRL. They are an overarching failure.
Under a bridgein Perth, where else would they be?
Didn't the Reds and Glory go bust?WA does not have a culture of Leagues Clubs. Sure a Perth based NRL team may look into a dedicated fans hospitality venue but they may not need to. WA is very used to Membership structured clubs and that's worked well for us, with our clubs in other codes being amongst the wealthiest in their leagues, or in the case of the Eagles, in the entire country.
Brown paper bags on a yacht for the WP porcupines, shame on you always greenAgree. I was talking to Peter Sterling, Brad Clyde and Darren Lockyer on Nick Politis' yacht the other day and we were saying the same thing.
As the Central Coast Bears ?, are you kidding, that team would’ve been a powerhouse.Thank f**k the NRL didn't go with the bears 20 years ago.
What fkn details they haven't released a bid, it's just all talk, he'll there's 2 Christchurch bids ffsBut no holes being poked in the Perth stand alone bid? Without even knowing its details?
Now that's overarchingUnder a bridge
You`re a builder I get it, if you don`t understand all the benefits that a state gov`t would get from having a multi-million dollar sporting franchise set up in their state then I can`t help you.Yes and to run a rugby league club properly costs quite the amount of money and all stuff you’re mentioning doesn’t mean anything to the actual club anyways.
Origin and magic round at Suncorp doesn’t go into the Broncos coffers no more then events in Perth would go into a Perth sides coffers. The government also needs to pay money to be awarded those events to begin with and a lot the money injected goes to local businesses anyways - not directly to the governments accounts. They get a portion sure.
So you’re correct that having an NRL club is beneficial but what’s more beneficial is having an NRL club that can actual self sustain itself.
We are in essence talking about two different things here. Now go back to your economics books.
That's right. I was responding to Iamback saying we shouldn't be putting holes in the bears bid. But he's happy to put holes on the Perth stand alone.What fkn details they haven't released a bid, it's just all talk, he'll there's 2 Christchurch bids ffs
There`ll be plenty of interest when they become a powerhouse one state team that is a regular top 4 contender. There`ll be interest when they play anybody.
PRS is too small and has terrible corporate facilities.Despite a stadium not really fit for NRL, a business case that fails to stack up, no value to TV and pretty much everyone else in the NRL thinking its a terrible idea Vlandys seems determined to make the train crash happen.
Well, if the NRL truly believes in PNG, they'll try to sell it to stakeholders (existing clubs, broadcasters, sponsors) as "this will be a great success", right...?
In the hope that they can will it past any hurdles.
That's right. I was responding to Iamback saying we shouldn't be putting holes in the bears bid. But he's happy to put holes on the Perth stand alone.
PNG will be team 18. Perth will be 19th so there wont be an extra game for them to affect TV.yes and that will take time.
We likely don't see that in the 1st TV cycle they are in.
Then the deal is less as opposed to the 9th game getting average ratings and keeping the value up
Nope, I don't think that's how it happened. Why would Vlandys say the Perth bid isn't dependent on partnering with norths?You don't think the NRL putting the Bears and WA Govt together shows there is holes in the stand alone bid?
PNG will be team 18. Perth will be 19th so there wont be an extra game for them to affect TV.