What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

18th club, whose next?

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,858
wouldn’t it be the same as the Dolphins? That they wouldn’t be allowed to be Ipswich Jets in NRL?

Maybe they’d be Bombers after all. Surely they would not use “Western Corridor” ? Sounds like directions the dunnies
Reserve grade will be in by then and it won’t be an issue
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,242
wouldn’t it be the same as the Dolphins? That they wouldn’t be allowed to be Ipswich Jets in NRL?

Maybe they’d be Bombers after all. Surely they would not use “Western Corridor” ? Sounds like directions the dunnies


Recliffe is just one suburb in large LGA of Morton bay. Ipswich is LGA which will most likely contain location of stadium at either north ipswich reserve or Springfield
 
Messages
14,822
Kinda like you when you comment about St George becoming Chinese dragons one minute, then British nationalists the next.

Branding is important, except certain ppl here don't understand basic concepts.



I imagine both sides wanted to be dominant partner. Jets have brand & important growth area, Tigers have money. Dolphins have it all & that's why it got up.

My stance on St George's brand is based on the club having no future in southern Sydney. There's just not enough people in southern Sydney to support two clubs.

The Dragons appear to be getting weaker and struggle for relevance despite having Illawarra all to themselves. That's not a good sign considering they were in a weak position before they merged in 1998.

If V'landys was fair dinkum he would allow the Magpies to use their brand so that Easts can become the Brisbane Tigers at NRL level.

Is there anything stopping Easts from becoming the Brisbane Bengals?
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,351
My stance on St George's brand is based on the club having no future in southern Sydney. There's just not enough people in southern Sydney to support two clubs.

The Dragons appear to be getting weaker and struggle for relevance despite having Illawarra all to themselves. That's not a good sign considering they were in a weak position before they merged in 1998.

If V'landys was fair dinkum he would allow the Magpies to use their brand so that Easts can become the Brisbane Tigers at NRL level.

Is there anything stopping Easts from becoming the Brisbane Bengals?
Nope and you guessed it....
...no Logan for you
 
Messages
14,816
Bringing in Firehawks would cause a major restructure of the Storm and force them to grow grassroots in Victoria. I was slightly alarmed when I read somewhere that actually a few of the Melbourne Rabble players in Super Rugby were actually from Melbourne whereas the Storm are mostly from Qld/NZ
I don't think forcing the Storm to grow grass roots in Victoria is a bad thing
 

greenBV4

Bench
Messages
2,510
If I was running the ARLC I'd announce Perth as the 18th team. I'd pay Bellamy a small fortune to coach the club, with the long-term plan of putting him in charge of their football department when he retires. I'd then add the Brisbane Firehawks and let Adelaide and New Zealand state their case for the 20th licence.
If I got chosen as club 18 Id be throwing the kitChen sink to get Bellamy to take up a head of football position with a good young coach under him. Then Shane Richardson to come on board as ceo.
Bellamy is contracted to Melbourne until 2027, but will likely retire from head caching this year and move closer to family in QLD and transition into a part time position (has this option with a pay-cut each year)

Even if 2028 lined up well with the 18th club entering I doubt he would return to head coaching after 4 years away from it, and even less so if it involved moving to Perth or New Zealand
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,858
I didn't say that i was pointing out a fact that you struggle with
NRLVic are not under the umbrella of the Storm, they are run by the NRL, report to the NRL and are funded by the NRL. In fact there's an argument the historic distance between the Storm and NRLVic has been bad for grassroots in Victoria for too long. Something that now seems to be put right.
 
Messages
14,816
NRLVic are not under the umbrella of the Storm, they are run by the NRL, report to the NRL and are funded by the NRL. In fact there's an argument the historic distance between the Storm and NRLVic has been bad for grassroots in Victoria for too long. Something that now seems to be put right.
You haven't a clue, and why would you you are a fan of the Anglo-Irish game.
Don't forget to answer my question about how much the midgets get every year from Vicky Kicky house and are not even treading water
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,858
There's only one spot for the NRL's next team - and it's not North Sydney Oval.

Much like stories about high speed rail are an inevitability before an election, the train is never late when it comes to musings about expanding the NRL hitting the news cycle every few months.
One rumoured bid - the front-runner, according to a recent story in the Daily Telegraph - would be to have a Pasifika franchise based out of Cairns that would play some home games in Samoa, Tonga, Papua New Guinea, and possibly even North Sydney.

It's a combination of ideas that genuinely feels like someone went on ChatGPT and said 'Please amalgamate every idea about NRL expansion that people have had in the past few years'.
Except, of course, the one that makes the most sense.

An NRL future without a Perth team is one the sport can't afford to see. There's no location more obvious, and more ready, to welcome a team.

The administration's general apathy towards climbing ticket prices ($40 to stand on a hill at Leichhardt Oval?) and game-day experiences in general have reiterated what we already knew; this is a TV sport, first and foremost. And if that's the case, why not try and lock in a new market in terms of not just fans, but a TV market as well?

For years the AFL has monopolised Sunday twilight views at pubs, even in the rugby league parts of Sydney, due to the 4.40pm local time kickoff that is often bestowed upon West Coast or Fremantle. Even if you ignore all the practical reasons, Perth trumps any east coast bid for this reason alone.

Not only that, but locals have shown their willingness to get behind teams other than just the Eagles and Dockers. The Scorchers have enjoyed bumper crowds this past BBL season, the Wildcats have been the hottest ticket in the NBL for much of the competition's existence, and the Glory had healthy crowds until a combination of COVID and the renovation of their home ground over the past couple of seasons.

The two State of Origin games at Optus Stadium both recorded sellouts of more than 59,000 people, and an NRL double header at the same ground drew 40,000 or so in 2018. The average of the 13 games held at Perth Rectangular Stadium between 2005 and 2017 would be healthy enough for any club not named the Broncos as well.
The latter would be an obvious, and freshly renovated, site for a rugby league team. Even North Sydney chairman Daniel Dickson conceded that a new bid with the Bears logo and colours attached could be "agile enough to know that it won't just be placed in North Sydney", so why not strike a deal in more ways than one?

The idea of the Perth Bears, absorbing Norths' colours, logo and history, is not a new concept - but if we are to move forward with an 18th team, it's an opportunity to secure a compromise that could please both those who want the NRL to become truly national, and those who still pine for one of the forgotten lights of yesteryear. On top of that, you could even have one game a year at North Sydney Oval, which would become a truly special day on the calendar.

But whether it's the Bears, the Pirates or even dusting off the old Reds gear and getting Cash Converters involved as a sponsor, there's only one city that truly makes sense for the NRL to plant their flag next.

 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,268
Thats NRLVic's job, not the Storms.
T
Bellamy is contracted to Melbourne until 2027, but will likely retire from head caching this year and move closer to family in QLD and transition into a part time position (has this option with a pay-cut each year)

Even if 2028 lined up well with the 18th club entering I doubt he would return to head coaching after 4 years away from it, and even less so if it involved moving to Perth or New Zealand
Broncos will sign him

bellamy is too young and too talented to retire permanent
 

Latest posts

Top