greenBV4
Bench
- Messages
- 2,510
Same thingOk let’s compare Sydney to Perth
Give Perth Sydney's funding for over the last 200 years for 200 years and itd probably be similar
Same thingOk let’s compare Sydney to Perth
Its not just Cronulla. Tigers and Bulldogs are not much better.Ohh ffs, we have been operating without a Leagues Club for what 3 or 4 years now.
That is a fact, and a fact you've ignored in your post compared to other teams.
DO NOT SKEW THIS INTO A POKIE DEN FIASCO.
The fact Cronulla has recorded a profit without their main source of income should be congratulated.
Really mate, these are your posts that make everyone see you in that negative light.
eh? were talking about the reach and influence of an NRL club. A perth club will be drawing from the whole state.f**k. 7000 participants in the Shire compared to 4000 in a whole State.
Get a grip.
Thats the whole point! You need an NRl club to turn those kids into NRL players! You cant say Perth doesnt currently produce many NRl players so shouldnt have an NRL club. Its a dumb argument. We have the numbers, we don't have the systems.Sorry, participation numbers are great but if you're not producing first graders than you're really just dicking around.
And before you start, take youre own logic: stop living in the 70s blah blah blah.
Let’s make it a trillion years.Same thing
Give Perth Sydney's funding for over the last 200 years for 200 years and itd probably be similar
Whole state that is about 95% desert and uninhabitedeh? were talking about the reach and influence of an NRL club. A perth club will be drawing from the whole state.
Thats the whole point! You need an NRl club to turn those kids into NRL players! You cant say Perth doesnt currently produce many NRl players so shouldnt have an NRL club. Its a dumb argument. We have the numbers, we don't have the systems.
Yet still, you only mentioned Cronulla.Its not just Cronulla. Tigers and Bulldogs are not much better.
It’s because he is trolling.Yet still, you only mentioned Cronulla.
It was a very negative post when it didn't need to be.
I'm pretty sure that most of these threads are troll threads.It’s because he is trolling
sureLet’s make it a trillion years.
Foxtel aren’t keen on PerthThe state of play for NRL’s 18th team as Dolphins answer glaring expansion question
The state of play for NRL’s 18th team as Dolphins answer glaring expansion questionwww.foxsports.com.au
Covers all option except Adelaide with Perth at the very very very bottom.
Norseman Bears for team 18So the WA population is 2.77 million.
Perth's population is 2.1 million.
I'm pretty sure we're going to get a lot of first graders out of Norseman or Hall's Creek.
And relies upon viewers in established markets to watch their teamPelican puts the boot into Sydney clubs whose long time success and popularity is the only reason Perth are a chance for a team.
And if Perth do get in and pilfer the players they produce he won't bat an eyelid.
Of course they aren't. There's no money in it for them.Foxtel aren’t keen on Perth
Fair points but isn't this true for almost anywhere? Or do we actually believe all of Redcliffes new fans are brand new to rugby leagueOf course they aren't. There's no money in it for them.
All rugby league supporters in WA would already be subscribed. And any other 'pick up' fans, say from that other game, would already be subscribed as well.
If anyone can't see that's why the media push for 'Pasifka' is on, well lawd help them.
New subscriptions.
Broncos have had nearly all games on free to air since their inception. This has been well documented.Fair points but isn't this true for almost anywhere? Or do we actually believe all of Redcliffes new fans are brand new to rugby league
I picked the bottom of the pile. Dont blame me for Sharks inadequacies lolYet still, you only mentioned Cronulla.
It was a very negative post when it didn't need to be.