Yes yes it isDidn't Sharks have to sign 3/4 of a spine from other clubs to finally win a comp?
Someone on here said they have 6000 players in the region, WA has 4100. Is it really that impressive after 50 years of an NRL club being there?
Yes yes it isDidn't Sharks have to sign 3/4 of a spine from other clubs to finally win a comp?
Someone on here said they have 6000 players in the region, WA has 4100. Is it really that impressive after 50 years of an NRL club being there?
You're the high flyer who knows everything and everybody. You do it.Best tell Politis then.
Albo is going to fund a png teamIs that albo or abdo, you seem to get confused?
or maybe its about pathways? You know actually having an NRL club with pathways available to the best 16 year olds?? There's 16 clubs in Cronulla region, 26 in WA. Maybe its not so much numbers after all?Very impressive. Some great players have come out of the Shire. Quality over quantity.
I already briefed him for the CEO meeting lol. 20 clubs by 2033. National metro expansion. He delivered my ideas well.You're the high flyer who knows everything and everybody. You do it.
I can guarantee you the players in the Cronulla juniors will be better than Perthor maybe its about pathways? You know actually having an NRL club with pathways available to the best 16 year olds?? There's 16 clubs in Cronulla region, 26 in WA. Maybe its not so much numbers after all?
So you're back rubbishing cronulla?or maybe its about pathways? You know actually having an NRL club with pathways available to the best 16 year olds?? There's 16 clubs in Cronulla region, 26 in WA. Maybe its not so much numbers after all?
I concur. Why wouldnt they be? They have access to better coaching, better nutritional programs, better elite pathways through the age groups etc etc . But none of that is unique and only available in cronulla. Its simply a matter of funding and opportunity. At the moment our naturally talented WA 16 year olds have 2 choices. Go into RU elite pathways or move to the east coast. There in lies the problem.I can guarantee you the players in the Cronulla juniors will be better than Perth
Lucky the arlc gave Cronulla more money then and didn’t waste money on a Perth nrl teamI concur. Why wouldnt they be? They have access to better coaching, better nutritional programs, better elite pathways through the age groups etc etc . But none of that is unique and only available in cronulla. Its simply a matter of funding and opportunity. At the moment our naturally talented WA 16 year olds have 2 choices. Go into RU elite pathways or move to the east coast. There in lies the problem.
AlwaysSo you're back rubbishing cronulla?
whooosh. The sound of the point made going over your head!Lucky the arlc gave Cronulla more money then and didn’t waste money on a Perth nrl team
Ohh ffs, we have been operating without a Leagues Club for what 3 or 4 years now.Sharks can only generate $11mill in revenue, how is topping them up to be profitable whilst we slash tens of millions out of grass roots and abandon our investment strategies a good thing?
Your the expert on awarding one pointwhooosh. The sound of the point made going over your head!
Reverse the 2, give Perth 50 years and the same amount of funding and the stats would be quite differentLucky the arlc gave Cronulla more money then and didn’t waste money on a Perth nrl team
f**k. 7000 participants in the Shire compared to 4000 in a whole State.or maybe its about pathways? You know actually having an NRL club with pathways available to the best 16 year olds?? There's 16 clubs in Cronulla region, 26 in WA. Maybe its not so much numbers after all?
Please don’t tell you are comparing an entire state with a population approaching 2 million with a part of Sydney with 200k residentsReverse the 2, give Perth 50 years and the same amount of funding and the stats would be quite different
beat me to itf**k. 7000 participants in the Shire compared to 4000 in a while State.
Get a grip.
Last I checked Perth was a city not a statePlease don’t tell you are comparing an entire state with a population approaching 2 million with a part of Sydney with 200k residents
beat me to it
Ok let’s compare Sydney to PerthLast I checked Perth was a city not a state
regardless, do the same thing with a suburb of Perth with 200k residents and the point still stands
He’s a negative old spite filled turd.f**k. 7000 participants in the Shire compared to 4000 in a whole State.
Get a grip.
Sorry, participation numbers are great but if you're not producing first graders than you're really just dicking around.Always
Just using them as an a example of two things, why the grants have had to be raised massively at the expense of other areas to cover failing businesses and that participation numbers in WA are not far off other areas that are put up as shining lights, its the development opportunities that are lacking in WA.