I bring up Hull because it exposes Perth Red's hypocrisy. He once said Brisbane should only have 2 teams because it is a "mid-size city". Brisbane has about 1.8m people. Hull only has 260k people, yet he thinks it needs two teams. He ridicules cities in Sydney with a larger population than Hull for having one team.
How can I take him seriously?
The idiot claimed Perth should have a team because its population is almost as big as Brisbane. Comparing a dyed in the wool fumbleball city to the world's second largest rugby league city is just dumb.
He's inconsistent and shifts the goalposts to suit his selfish agenda.
Using Perth Red's logic, Brisbane should have 20 teams because it is 10 times bigger than Hull.
Here is the thing that makes me lose all respect for Perth Red. After years of saying Sydney clubs need to generate more revenue from football operations to be more like the Broncos, he's completely dismissed this metric because it supports Brisbane Tigers getting the 18th licence. The club has the resources needed to compete with Broncos and are projected to be one of the four richest rugby league clubs in the world. But apparently we're supposed to ignore this strength and dismiss the Tigers because Perth doesn't have a team.
Have a cup of tea and sit down