:lol: Some great posting here
Of course no blame can be placed on Haddin, the umpire is supposed to be able to tell that the keeper knocked over the stumps rather than the ball when Haddin apparently didnt even see it :lol:
So he was bowled cleanly? Or not?
No, but the ball had bypassed him and would likely have hit the stumps irrespective of Haddin's gloves. The point the poster was making is that he deserved to get out given he played such a rubbish shot - don't try arguing semantics on an opinion.
Rubbish
Either he's out cleanly or he's not out
His shot selection doesn't affect the legitimacy of a dismissal
Rubbish
Either he's out cleanly or he's not out
His shot selection doesn't affect the legitimacy of a dismissal
And the ball actually travelled OVER the bails and into Haddins palms whose fingertips dislodge the bails.
And the ball actually travelled OVER the bails and into Haddins palms whose fingertips dislodge the bails.
jesus these f**king kiwis will never shut up about this if they lose
jesus these f**king kiwis will never shut up about this if they lose
Yep, its bad luck. Happens in cricket. But don't give me Timmah's rubbish about how he deserved to be out for playing a poor shot