- Messages
- 68,485
Smith is easily a better 4 or 5 than a 3. Look at his shots in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Ashes tests for evidence why.
Averages over 71 batting at no3
over 47.00 even if you take out the double ton
Last edited:
Smith is easily a better 4 or 5 than a 3. Look at his shots in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Ashes tests for evidence why.
Averages over 71 batting at no3
over 47.00 even if you take out the double ton
Smith is easily a better 4 or 5 than a 3. Look at his shots in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Ashes tests for evidence why.
Scored nothing when the ball moved. Not a number 3 yet. He might, but I do feel he is perfectly suited to 4. Similarly ABDV doesn't bat 3. Both are genuine middle order bats
We never had an issue with playing Pidge, Bing and Dizzy together, thats 3 right arm bowlers
What the problem with 2 lefties ?
Pick your best 3 quicks imo
Scored nothing when the ball moved. Not a number 3 yet. He might, but I do feel he is perfectly suited to 4. Similarly ABDV doesn't bat 3. Both are genuine middle order bats
Are both Notch and Starc in our top 3 fast bowlers at...test level?
Id go for Johnson, Hazlewood and either Siddle or Pattinson
Siddle has performed better at test level than Starc, is also a lot more economical
Are we doing a fantasy cricket thingy ?