Maybe you should merge ;-) The complete team then.. and im sure the two fan bases would love it as you clearly get along on here.hrundi99 said:It's the opposite to us this year. Plenty of good go-forward and ineffective halves.
Tommy Smith said:Nothing better than this years unfortunately. And i have nothing against the Tigers so i thinks its a shame that it doesnt look as though they'll be going from strength to strength. They needed some forwards, more forwards, a strong running backrower, a big prop and some more forwards...not Paul Whatuira.hrundi99 said:What would be a tentative Tigers lineup that should have me dazzled?
Ideas please.
Good response. What youngsters are coming through in the forwards? Harrison looks good, Gibbs seems alright and i havent seen much of Heighnington (sp?). Also what about Farah? I thought he'd be your regular hooker by now. Anyone else to look out for next year?Eddie. said:Tommy Smith said:Nothing better than this years unfortunately. And i have nothing against the Tigers so i thinks its a shame that it doesnt look as though they'll be going from strength to strength. They needed some forwards, more forwards, a strong running backrower, a big prop and some more forwards...not Paul Whatuira.hrundi99 said:What would be a tentative Tigers lineup that should have me dazzled?
Ideas please.
I can see what your saying and it is a bit of a concern. Clubs below have have boosted their ranks whilst we have been very quiet in the market. having said that choping and changing your squad is not always the way to go and Sheens had a 3 yr plan in which 2005 would be the year where the exciting younger players we have would take over and make the club a top 8 team. Tim Sheens has slowly but surely improved not just the team but the club and we will definetly improve next year, i spose its just how mich teams around us will improve. I predicted a 8th to 11th finish this season, i reckon Sheens will be aiming for 6th to 8th next year. if forced to predict i would say Parra and newy are the only teams that i think might be a chance of finishing higher then us next season of the team currently below us.
marshall only played 6 games this year, so he is almost like a new signing and will take the pressure off prince at halfback. i think thats a fairly significent improvment already for 2005.
Eddie. said:Tommy Smith said:Nothing better than this years unfortunately. And i have nothing against the Tigers so i thinks its a shame that it doesnt look as though they'll be going from strength to strength. They needed some forwards, more forwards, a strong running backrower, a big prop and some more forwards...not Paul Whatuira.hrundi99 said:What would be a tentative Tigers lineup that should have me dazzled?
Ideas please.
I can see what your saying and it is a bit of a concern. Clubs below have have boosted their ranks whilst we have been very quiet in the market. having said that choping and changing your squad is not always the way to go and Sheens had a 3 yr plan in which 2005 would be the year where the exciting younger players we have would take over and make the club a top 8 team. Tim Sheens has slowly but surely improved not just the team but the club and we will definetly improve next year, i spose its just how mich teams around us will improve. I predicted a 8th to 11th finish this season, i reckon Sheens will be aiming for 6th to 8th next year. if forced to predict i would say Parra and newy are the only teams that i think might be a chance of finishing higher then us next season of the team currently below us.
marshall only played 6 games this year, so he is almost like a new signing and will take the pressure off prince at halfback. i think thats a fairly significent improvment already for 2005.
1. Cowboys