bobmar28
Bench
- Messages
- 4,304
Since you're photoshopping, you should put him in a Bulldogs jersey
Better leave him in that Sea Eagles jersey. Latest news is he is not going anywhere. According to the Tele.
Last edited:
Since you're photoshopping, you should put him in a Bulldogs jersey
Better leave him in that Sea Eagles jersey. Latest news is he is not going anywhere. According to the Tele.
Well looks like they have all found a new spot for another Ad
The little adidas/ nike / ISC logo etc added some credibility to the jerseys.
This will take it away,,,
it looks just like a manufactures logo anyway. Hardly any difference to the ISC that was on there last year. Unlike the Knights which is clearly another sponsor.
So are they still allowed to have sleave sponsors with manufacturer sponsors?
I don't think the clubs should be allowed to have manufacturer and a sponsor on the sleave AND have another small sponsor front and centre.
If the NRL allows this to continue they will end up with Bathurst 1000 billboards rather than jerseys.
Cash vs integrity of brand... some nuffies at clubs are making the wrong decisions.
So are they still allowed to have sleave sponsors with manufacturer sponsors?
I don't think the clubs should be allowed to have manufacturer and a sponsor on the sleave AND have another small sponsor front and centre.
If the NRL allows this to continue they will end up with Bathurst 1000 billboards rather than jerseys.
Cash vs integrity of brand... some nuffies at clubs are making the wrong decisions.
Looking forward to the away jersey though..