Western_Eel
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,395
Roosters should be 20k, no excuses. To be nearly match by penrith who had nowhere near the success of the roosters is damming.
I don't think success is a good indicator of who should have the most members.
Roosters should be 20k, no excuses. To be nearly match by penrith who had nowhere near the success of the roosters is damming.
Are you a bot?
I think the main reason the NRL is pushing towards 400K memberships is because crowds will only rise when memberships are greater than avg crowd figures. If you look at other sports, member numbers are always higher than avg crowds. So although crowds look to be stagnate, it's just reaching a point where there is a bigger chance of a springboard effect in that crowds in the next 5 years will start to increase greatly as long as memberships do.
I'm no bot fact is the rooster numbers are disappointing for a foundation club and current premiers.
The crowds have looked pretty good over the last weekend. The Roosters i have to say have improved, and they have record members as well as the cows i read.
You cant knock improvement.
It is alright to rant like a looney, but when we show improvement it needs to be applauded.
We have very little to cheer about lately except the quality of the players and games.
so they've gone backwards ?:sarcasm:
Roosters should be 20k, no excuses. To be nearly match by penrith who had nowhere near the success of the roosters is damming.
I'm no bot fact is the rooster numbers are disappointing for a foundation club and current premiers.
How many SCG Trust members would have Roosters memberships if they didn't have access to the games?
How many ANZ Members would be Bulldogs Members if they didnt have access.
WT have gotten to 8004