Oh right ... if he's not playing a shot then fair enough
No arguments hereAll the best openers play and miss a lot, because they don't chase the swing. Guys like Warner and Hayden can bully the life out of a side, but they're always likely to nick off....whether they're on 13 or 213, they chase the ball
I really like that Renshaw doesn't
Is that hiney on the cricket after his 20th kraken ?
lol, the poor bastard got absolutely smashed by the security guard. and then got a knee in the back by the copper for his troubles. He will wake up tomorrow with a hangover and a 8k fine hanging over his head.Is that hiney on the cricket after his 20th kraken ?
Steve Smith average a hundred every three matches. Pretty bloody handy for a guy who took 12 matches to score his first....
Tugger took 27 tests didn't he?
In this day and age, and he keeps churning them out, Smiths average could be around 75 when he retires
I reckon he will become our best batsman behind Bradman, give it 2-3 years more
Like I said in the match thread, if Smith plays as many tests as Waugh and Ponting and continues this strike rate for tonnes he'll have 56 hundreds. Tendulkar scored 51.
It's a hard ask though at 27 and yet to play 50 tests. He'd have to play 120 more matches... so maybe aggregate and average is more likely.
He's already achieved a hell of a lot for a bloke most people wrote off as a potentially ok leg spinner who could bat a bit
Is that "women's" cricket like that McGregor woman? Or did the other batters forget they were at the strikers end after overs of hogging by the other woman?We haven't had a batter who has done this before.