What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016/17 Summer of Cricket

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,363
Kholi with plenty to say in the media accusing Australia of cheating for 3 days, referring to seeking advice from his dressing room for DRS reviews. I dont think this will end any time soon.



When Smith was ruled out lbw in a tense chase of 188, he looked towards the dressing room after having chatted with non-striker Peter Handscomb, apparently for clues on whether to review the call or not. Umpire Nigel Llong intervened immediately, and sent him on his way. Llong also prevented a seemingly livid Kohli from getting into that conversation. Kohli later said he had brought this matter to the umpires' attention earlier too.

"I saw that two times happening when I was batting out there," Kohli said. "I pointed it out to the umpire as well, that it's happened twice, that I've seen their players looking upstairs for confirmation, and that's why the umpire was at him.

"When he turned back the umpire knew exactly what was going on, because we observed that, we told match referee also, and the umpires, that they've been doing that for the last three days and this has to stop, because there's a line that you don't cross on the cricket field, because sledging and playing against the opponents is different, but… I don't want to mention the word, but it falls in that bracket. I would never do something like that on the cricket field."

When asked if the word he didn't want to mention was "cheating", Kohli replied: "I didn't say that, you did."

Smith's version of events was different. "I got hit on the pad and looked down to Petey and he said look up there," Smith said. "So I turned around and it was a bit of a brain fade on my behalf. I shouldn't have done that.

"I was looking at our boys, so shouldn't have done that and it was a bit of a brain fade."

Kohli, though, refused to accept Smith's explanation. "Honestly, if someone makes a mistake while batting, for me, personally, that's a brain fade," Kohli said. "The way I left the ball in Pune, you know, getting hit on the off stump. That was a brain fade. But if something is going on for three days, then that's not a brain fade, as simple as that.

"I don't want to say more on that, videos are out there for everyone to see. It was getting repetitive, that's why the umpires also knew that it might happen again. I saw it two times when I was batting, I can vouch for that."

The official BCCI Twitter handle, though, went on to say more. It tweeted the video of Smith's dismissal, the accompanying tweet wondering if the full form of DRS was "dressing room review system".

Smith denied that his side used help from the dressing room as a DRS tactic. He insisted his dismissal was the first time he looked up to the dressing room. "No, I think that's probably the first time it's happened, and it was a brain fade on my behalf," he said.

There were an increasing number of verbal exchanges throughout the Test. Smith admitted to there being a "nospam29", but he felt the match was played "in good spirit".

"Australia and India playing, there's always emotions flying around and we get a little bit of nospam29 every now and then," Smith said. "As long as it's kept on the field it's all good. There's always interesting banter between the two teams, and I think it makes it a great contest."

Kohli also hit back at former Australia wicketkeeper, Ian Healy, who had earlier criticised Kohli's behaviour during Australia's first innings, particularly when Smith was at the crease.

"I'm losing respect for him. He's not only now continuing his disrespect of the Australian players and umpires, but I think he's putting pressure on his own players," Healy told radio station SEN on Monday. "The stuff he did with Steve Smith was unacceptable.

"There's massive cracks showing in [Kohli]. I've said in the past he's the best batsman I've ever seen. His feistiness and real aggression towards the opposition has been good [in the past], especially when he wasn't captain."

Kohli responded by pointing out Healy's reaction to being wrongly given out in the Centurion Test in 1997 - swearing as he walked off, Healy then threw his bat while climbing the steps to the dressing room.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-australia-2016-17/content/story/1085719.html
 

BoneyBlake17

Juniors
Messages
885
India has this victim mentality that they are always right and always the victim.

Like the monkey-gate circus a decade ago where they threatened to go home.

They have all the power in the game and kohli is the cameron smith of cricket.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,363
Marcus Stoinis ?

no, really ?

You couldn't make this up, seems you only need an average of 13 to get a game for Australia. There seems to be little point in busting your arse in Shield cricket for years to get into the Australian team.
 
Messages
19,393
Marcus Stoinis ?

no, really ?

You couldn't make this up, seems you only need an average of 13 to get a game for Australia. There seems to be little point in busting your arse in Shield cricket for years to get into the Australian team.

I would presume that Maxwell is now a shoo-in for the next test. It does seem odd, but I sort of think that Stoinis might work at 6 (in the short run). He can actually defend which is a good start. Henriques would obviously have got the job if his record in Asia wasn't so god awful.

What this reflects is the fact that the Shield calendar has been sacrificed for the BB. Most of the Shield form was established in November.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
68,422
We need a clean broom sweep from the top Sutherland, that twat Howard (should have been punted years ago)Hohns , Mark Waugh all fruitcakes who have disrespected the baggy green with this bullshot "gut feeling" selection policy
 

Dibs

Bench
Messages
4,215
Yep it doesn't work for you with tipping, it certainly isn't going to work for selecting our best 11
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,363
I would presume that Maxwell is now a shoo-in for the next test. It does seem odd, but I sort of think that Stoinis might work at 6 (in the short run). He can actually defend which is a good start. Henriques would obviously have got the job if his record in Asia wasn't so god awful.

What this reflects is the fact that the Shield calendar has been sacrificed for the BB. Most of the Shield form was established in November.

I said a couple of weeks ago in the cricket forum that Hohns will try and justify Maxwells position in the team, despite having a test average of about 7, that "we just think he is a good fit". Thanks god he wasn't picked.

Yesterday he tried to justify the Stoinis selection over Henriques saying "we just think he is a good fit for the team".

Its sounds to me like he wants to fit Stoinis in the team, not just to be part of the squad. If thats the case you have to wonder why Oozie was ever picked in the squad.
 
Messages
19,393
I said a couple of weeks ago in the cricket forum that Hohns will try and justify Maxwells position in the team, despite having a test average of about 7, that "we just think he is a good fit". Thanks god he wasn't picked.

Yesterday he tried to justify the Stoinis selection over Henriques saying "we just think he is a good fit for the team".

Its sounds to me like he wants to fit Stoinis in the team, not just to be part of the squad. If thats the case you have to wonder why Oozie was ever picked in the squad.

I guess that if it looks like another cracked up wicket (and thus relatively few overs to bowl), they may just pick the Oozster, and rely on a few overs from Smith to give the others a rest. Or.....they might be silly enough to think that Agar can bat at 7.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,363
I guess that if it looks like another cracked up wicket (and thus relatively few overs to bowl), they may just pick the Oozster, and rely on a few overs from Smith to give the others a rest. Or.....they might be silly enough to think that Agar can bat at 7.

JL is probabaly the reason why Agar is there, he has been blowing this guys trumpet for years.

With the way our 2 spinners have bowled I really don't see any need for another, but thats just me.

I'd say after the last test we can expect a similar pitch and as you say Stoinis has a decent defensive technique but he has bugger all fist class experience and this may be way above him right now.
 
Messages
19,393
Well, this is interesting. Cummins is the best option, but pitches don't suit and may not be worth the long-term risk. He can bat a bit as well.
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,858
I thought Starc was pretty good in the first test. Very ordinary initially in the second innings in test 2, but then broke it open. And he scored vitals runs in both.
Yeah I have to agree about his batting, which has been very good. I just don't think he has been consistent enough with the ball. However, I backed in SOK over Lyon prior to Lyon taking 8 wickets in an innings so what would I know.

Mind you, SOK is still the highest wicket taker.
 

Latest posts

Top