Billythekid
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,837
Hopefully the rain doesn't effect either game. We could get as many as 65K through tomorrow which would be fantastic.
your so called friend is a softy, it's hardly any rain predicted, there was a hailstorm in 2015 and they still managed 35k, so it would have to be quite a lot of rain to impact the attendance significantly.
T-Boon can you tell us all one more time why rugby league is going down the gurgler and your proposed changes.
People on here forget that if you visit a Crowd Watch thread on an Internet forum, by definition you are a hardcore fan (or troll) that is in no way representative of the general public.
Text I received today:
"So what's the plan boys? 70% chance of showers between 3 and 9pm. What time is the game?"
T-Boon can you tell us all one more time why rugby league is going down the gurgler and your proposed changes.
That's not really true. I don't think many of the posters who frequent this thread actually go to many games.
Sydney people might just be the most fickle sooks on the planet, it's amazing that we even average 10k..
Don't keep blaming the punter. We go to Big Bash and Swans games.
The NRL, clubs think the on-field product is great. They are kidding themselves.
Don't keep blaming the punter. We go to Big Bash and Swans games.
The NRL, clubs think the on-field product is great. They are kidding themselves.
Then f**k off and go and watch the Swans and Wanderers with Rothfield. I think big bash would be better with 4 × 10 over innings not 2 x 20.
Nah. I am a bigger fan than you. I am wanting to fix things, you are happy for the code to stink and languish behind AFL. Lousy fan. Go away.
The more you change the rules the more you f**k it up. Let it evolve naturally. Someone will come up with an attacking strategy that out guns Bennett Ball and Bellamy Wrestle. It has before and it will again. Leave the rules alone ffs.
If I thought it was languishing behind afl I would be watching afl like you clearly do. The game is fine. The biggest reason for frustrating aspects creeping into the game in the last 20 years relates to rule changes.
You are totally wrong. The game stopped evolving its rules way to early. They just tinker with inconsequential rule changes. I can't even think of any of any significance in the last 5 years.
Look at the scrum. It has been ruined by coaches input and the rules committee failed to do anything in time and we are left with an embarrassment that you couldn't even explain to an outside. There is no sensible reason to hang on to the scrum as it is, except fear of change.
No one will challenge Bellamy's style now because most of the coaches came from his stables and additionally playing his style is easy and the way to be successful.
"let it evolve naturally" - thats how we got wrestles to begin with.
Every sensible code stays on top of its rules and changes as it needs to. Except Rugby League.
I can hardly think of an NRL rule change in the last 20 years.
The 10 metres - when did that come in about 25 years ago.
40/20. Nothing wrong with that one.
What are you talking about?
Go watch afl mate.
That's what scrums once did, got the forwards out the way. Plus the 10 metre rule has given cheap easy metres. Back in the 80's one out hit ups was described as dumb boring football now it's the staple of the game.
I cringe seeing a big prop playing at five eighth off the scrum, we've evolved from the velvet skill of Brett Kenny to the bash of Fifita at 5/8. even the English once had skilfull forwards and halves, Schofield, Gregory, Ward and Crooks who all were stars in Australia and England.
The strip. The drs and all the changes around what they can and cannot review. The interpretation of an illegal tackle and penalising of a legal tackle cause it hurts. The interchange and its multiple iterations.
Need I go on?