Because you're allowed to tackle attacking players in the air.
Yes, but he put him in a dangerous position.
Because you're allowed to tackle attacking players in the air.
Oh you mean like Cordner when he was questioning the ref? Oh wait a minute. absolutely no one complained then. It's only when Smith does it.
Actually Smith & Thurston. Both carry on like whiny little b*tches if/something goes against them.Oh you mean like Cordner when he was questioning the ref? Oh wait a minute. absolutely no one complained then. It's only when Smith does it.
It's all your solicitor captain ever does. Seeing him cop bad decisions every once in a while fills my heart with joy.How did he get his way in that.Ref was wrong. Any captain would have questioned him..cordner questioned the ref but has anyone complained about that?
Not really. He got into a dangerous position. The defender didn't really put him in it.Yes, but he put him in a dangerous position.
You're talking to someone lacking a brain. Takes a bit for it to sink in for them.A bit different when Cordner questions 5 or 6 calls in a row against his team and the ref has stopped time to talk to him.
Smith did it because he couldn't handle the fact his team got a call against his team.
Cordner questioned the ref earlier so where is the outrage about thatDoesn't matter, you can't stand there and have a debate with the ref.
Not really. He got into a dangerous position. The defender didn't really put him in it.
Double standards methinks.A bit different when Cordner questions 5 or 6 calls in a row against his team and the ref has stopped time to talk to him.
Smith did it because he couldn't handle the fact his team got a call against his team.
Plenty of double standards in this game don't you worry.Double standards methinks.
Double standards methinks.