2018 Membership Thread

[Cockosh]

These are the home averages for every current club from 1998 to 2017. It has 5, 10 and 20 year average. Whilst our crowds are poor by no means are we the worst. That includes years without ANZAC Day, Gosford or any other exceptional games. So we aren't the "last club" that to have a light hearted dig at out rivals.

 

[Clifferd]

These are the home averages for every current club from 1998 to 2017. It has 5, 10 and 20 year average. Whilst our crowds are poor by no means are we the worst. That includes years without ANZAC Day, Gosford or any other exceptional games. So we aren't the "last club" that to have a light hearted dig at out rivals.

The blokes team who’s arguing with you is coming 2nd last

Oh the irony haha

 

[M2D2]

The blokes team who’s arguing with you is coming 2nd last

Oh the irony haha

These are the home averages for every current club from 1998 to 2017. It has 5, 10 and 20 year average. Whilst our crowds are poor by no means are we the worst. That includes years without ANZAC Day, Gosford or any other exceptional games. So we aren't the "last club" that to have a light hearted dig at out rivals.

*points to the title of this thread*

 

[Clifferd]

*points to the title of this thread*

More irony. Pretty sure you started this whole argument

 

[M2D2]

More irony. Pretty sure you started this whole argument

Depends on your outlook. Im not the one who throws shit at team for having more members than them in a membership thread and tried to use crowd attendance figures that have been inflated due to a match they share with the Dragons and games NOT PLAYED AT ALLIANZ as a reason why he could.
But considering the fact i called you out on all your lies in a thread cause you couldnt accept at the time your club was the club most in danger at the time and even said in time it wont be you it will be some other team (and would you look at that. the tits got super shit) that you still cant let it go and have an agenda against me, i think we know which way youll go.

 

[cain3y]

TOTAL: 287028

St George, Canberra, Parramatta or Cronulla at this stage look the most likely to surpass last years membership numbers soon.

 

[Miller was a legend]

View attachment 18831

TOTAL: 287028

St George, Canberra, Parramatta or Cronulla at this stage look the most likely to surpass last years membership numbers soon.

Given how the sides are going that’s fantastic by the Raiders and Parra

 

[cain3y]

Given how the sides are going that’s fantastic by the Raiders and Parra

I'm not surprized by Parramatta's Membership numbers given how large their supporter base is. If they won a comp they could be the first team to crack 40k IMO.

I am though surprized that Canberra's numbers have continued to rise after starting the seasons so poorly, but good signs though that being a member of a club is starting to be something that NRL supports now hold onto.

 

[Timmah]

With comparisons to last year about six days away, still 9k ahead of 2017.

Storm and Newcastle still the only teams to have surpassed their final total from last year, although ten clubs are tracking ahead of last year's same-time figure.

http://leagueunlimited.com/news/31031-2018-nrl-club-membership-tracker/

 

[Lambretta]

Same way you were there when you claimed 17k last week. Sure.
Sure looked like more sky blue then dark blue and red in the crowd, sure sounded like more sharks fans as well. So while you say you were there. The evidence says otherwise, especially with previous games at CC....

The away fans were on the side of the stadium the cameras were pointed at. That was the side exposed to the sun.

The home fans were on the shaded side (as I was) which is where the cameras are.

On TV it might look like you had more there if you look at 50% of the crowd

Oh and of couse you made more noise.... you f**king thrashed us. Losing teams dont cheer.

 

[Lambretta]

Same way you were there when you claimed 17k last week. .

I swear they put up a crowd figure of 16 thousand and something on the screen. But I must have been mistaken. Or drunk. Its very possible I was drunk.

 

[Billythekid]

View attachment 18838

With comparisons to last year about six days away, still 9k ahead of 2017.

Storm and Newcastle still the only teams to have surpassed their final total from last year, although ten clubs are tracking ahead of last year's same-time figure.

http://leagueunlimited.com/news/31031-2018-nrl-club-membership-tracker/

9K more would be a fantastic result. Also good to see even the Titans have finally seen a bit of growth.

 

[titoelcolombiano]

Ok mate lol.
You do realise EVERY teams home average includes fans from other clubs. You just seem intent on being selective in applying it to us.
And you still won’t confirm your attendance at Gosford? On what basis did you conclude there were more sharks fans there?

Very ture - Melbourne and Manly include the Suncorp double headerin their average. Souths go to Perth amongst others. If you attract fans to your games it counts - no matter where you attract them.

 

[titoelcolombiano]

Edit: Double Post

 

[Dragon Slayer]

Shame the NRL didn’t let the Gold Coast go broke. For a regional city their membership numbers are pathetic!

Swap them for a 2nd Brisbane team and stop all the expansion talk.

 

[Timmah]

Very ture - Melbourne and Manly include the Suncorp double headerin their average. Souths go to Perth amongst others. If you attract fans to your games it counts - no matter where you attract them.

The closest thing we have to an official set of club averages is what Big League publish - this is an excerpt from their Finals Week 1 edition last year. Melbourne and Manly clearly do not include the double header at Suncorp in their home average. If they did, the Storm would've have 18,375 and Manly 13,493.

 

[Cockosh]

I took mine from Afltables which seems to apply double header crowds to both “home” teams

 

[titoelcolombiano]

I took mine from Afltables which seems to apply double header crowds to both “home” teams

Yes I get my figures from that source too. It is a "home" game for them afterall

 

[Saint Doc]

Do you really think a website called AFL tables is the official crowd stats of the NRL? Compared to the magazine owned and operated by the NRL?

 

[Cockosh]

Do you really think a website called AFL tables is the official crowd stats of the NRL? Compared to the magazine owned and operated by the NRL?

Did I say it was the official site or superior to the mag? Despite the name it is an extremely reliable source for all sorts of nrl stats that many on here refer to. Do yourself a favour and have a look. Happy to be pointed in the direction of other more reliable sources.