Lol you dont understand the argument you greasy merkin. Just climb back into your daddy's bed.
Completely understand the argument. We are talking about Joeys problem, right? Same one Locky had......
Lol you dont understand the argument you greasy merkin. Just climb back into your daddy's bed.
But they did. Didn't they?And at one stage maroons selectors hadn't heard of Smith, Slater and Cronk.
But keep on with the thin argument.
Who cares, like I said you used to be able to choose like ken nagas didyes but he played for hunter sports high before Wavel
Rage? Nah. Keep on with the vague assumptions thoughBut they did. Didn't they?
NSW selectors probably only discovered Inglis after he first planted the Steeden in the NSW in-goal.
But keep on with the misdirected rage.
Rage, impotence. Call it what you will.Rage? Nah. Keep on with the vague assumptions though
Where does the Game 2 info come from?I don't know how all 3 judges voted Slater 4 points for the 2nd game.. he had a outstanding first 20 minutes and hardly sighted after that. Last night all 3 voted Slater 4 points again.. odd.
In his "don't mock my integrity" rant, Mal "failed politician" Meninga said he would've given Slater man of the match for game 2. So he, Lockyer and his little bitch Daley likely gave him the four for that game too.Where does the Game 2 info come from?
Cordner had to have got the most votes in Game 2 as he was man of the match.
North of the Tweed I believe it would be called 'spirit'.Rage, impotence. Call it what you will.
I believe the word you are looking for is 'passion'.North of the Tweed I believe it would be called 'spirit'.
He was a liability in Game 1. An utter wet blanket in attack in game 2 and was passable in game 3.He had a poor game in game 1 but he wasn’t anywhere near as bad as everyone was making out in game 2. Latrell got the better of him once but Chambers ran all around Mitchell most of the game, scoring a try and getting an assist, should of had two assists if not for ridiculous bunker mistake. And game 3 he was fantastic
So 1 try, 1 try assist (should have been 2), a linebreak, a linebreak assist, 130+ meters is an utter wet blanket in attack?He was a liability in Game 1. An utter wet blanket in attack in game 2 and was passable in game 3.
Plus a couple of kicks over the dead ball, at least 2 cold dropped passes in space, several missed tackles... definitely not up to his usual standard in this series.So 1 try, 1 try assist (should have been 2), a linebreak, a linebreak assist, 130+ meters is an utter wet blanket in attack?
Yeah like I’ve said before, not his best but nowhere near as bad as everyone has been making out. He outplayed Mitchell in games 2 and 3Plus a couple of kicks over the dead ball, at least 2 cold dropped passes in space, several missed tackles... definitely not up to his usual standard in this series.
Yeah like I’ve said before, not his best but nowhere near as bad as everyone has been making out. He outplayed Mitchell in games 2 and 3
He passed something?and was passable in game 3.
The couple of years out really enabled the last couple of seasons to happen for Slater. Really refreshed him and his recovery effort was impressive.Definitely. 35 and still a freak compared to the rest. Incredible.