typicalfan
Coach
- Messages
- 15,488
There is an argument to take Mitch Marsh into the test due to Pattinson being injury prone. They have Steve Waugh who's only flaw is he is probably the biggest Mitch Marsh fan which is a concern.
Only issue is Nathan Lyon likes exploiting the footmarks left by Starc so this could reduce his efficiency. And funnily enough he is probably our most reliable bowler right now.Yep, so it's understandable they are leaning to the bowlers in form.
Only issue is Nathan Lyon likes exploiting the footmarks left by Starc so this could reduce his efficiency. And funnily enough he is probably our most reliable bowler right now.
I think you might find Mitch Marsh is in the team tonight.
No words
Might as well play Starc instead if that's the case.
He won't do any worse than Marsh with the bat and is more likely to do something with the ball.
I'm not convinced on Mitch Marsh's batting in England.Starc’s batting has gone downhill in the last 2 years.
We don’t need a fifth bowler at all, other than some relief overs.
I'm not convinced on Mitch Marsh's batting in England.
I'm not convinced on Mitch Marsh's batting in England.
Wade at 5
Mitch at 6
Paine at 7
What can go wrong?
Wade at 5
Mitch at 6
Paine at 7
What can go wrong?
God help us allWade at 5
Mitch at 6
Paine at 7
What can go wrong?
I’m not convinced of it pretty much anywhere. The better thing to do is play a batsmen at 6.
A lot of contention about Warner's opening partner and the No.6 position, has meant Head's position has avoided scrutiny. Like Burns and Patterson, his only runs of substance were v Sri Lanka, now he seems a lock whilst the others were dropped. I'll be surprised if he averages over 35.
Best of an ordinary bunch?