What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2019 ASHES: 4th Test Australia v England, Old Trafford Sept 4-9

Bgoodorgoodatit

Juniors
Messages
1,506
Well outside of Smiffy getting his 100 that couldn’t have gone much better....

Hilarious reading through the thread too... haha
 

nöyd

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
9,809
EoEliTN.jpg


lol

his last 13 innings against the soap dodgers:

143
141
40
6
239
76
102
83
144
142
92
211
82

stop the fight, textbook raep
 
Last edited:

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
51,109
Key wickets of Burns and Root by the Stallion. These two are England's main stick - arounders, if they could have layed a base the likes of Stokes and Buttler could have made a charge.

Now it's left to Denly and Roy :joy::joy::joy:
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,417
Speaking of Ben Stokes and all-rounders what stats do you need to actually be classed as an all-rounder? in my mind guys like Stokes and Flintoff who average 30+ with the ball and low 30's with the bat means there equally ordinary at both things,why is this seen as an achievement?

Imran Khan,Keith Miller,Jacques Kallis and Gary Sobers are the only true all-rounders in cricket history bruh

P.S Kapil Dev and Ian Botham don't belong with the above 4 bruh


Best baleed dat
 
Messages
11,722
Speaking of Ben Stokes and all-rounders what stats do you need to actually be classed as an all-rounder? in my mind guys like Stokes and Flintoff who average 30+ with the ball and low 30's with the bat means there equally ordinary at both things,why is this seen as an achievement?

Imran Khan,Keith Miller,Jacques Kallis and Gary Sobers are the only true all-rounders in cricket history bruh

P.S Kapil Dev and Ian Botham don't belong with the above 4 bruh


Best baleed dat

I can't think of a player who's actually been a true all rounder though. Someone that would get into any team on the basis of either bowling or batting - I'm thinking a guy who averages at least 45 and has a bowling below around 27-28.

All those guys listed are far better at one facet of the game than the other, which subsequently becomes what they're predominantly known for.

I would stay Stokes' bowling and batting are much closer, but the level of either those aren't that great to begin with, relative to those considered great.
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,417
I can't think of a player who's actually been a true all rounder though. Someone that would get into any team on the basis of either bowling or batting - I'm thinking a guy who averages at least 45 and has a bowling below around 27-28.

All those guys listed are far better at one facet of the game than the other, which subsequently becomes what they're predominantly known for.

I would stay Stokes' bowling and batting are much closer, but the level of either those aren't that great to begin with, relative to those considered great.

This is correct,i was just spiting Flintoff and Stokes out of butthurtness cos there way better than Aussie donkey all-rounders

Butthurttrain
 
Messages
21,880
I can't think of a player who's actually been a true all rounder though. Someone that would get into any team on the basis of either bowling or batting - I'm thinking a guy who averages at least 45 and has a bowling below around 27-28.

All those guys listed are far better at one facet of the game than the other, which subsequently becomes what they're predominantly known for.

I would stay Stokes' bowling and batting are much closer, but the level of either those aren't that great to begin with, relative to those considered great.

That’s a very hard standard to live up to.

To produce those type of stats at both batting and bowling you’re talking about an absolute freak of an athlete. I doubt we’ll ever see a better all rounders than Kallis, Miller & Khan

Kallis the best batting all rounder

Miller/Khan the best bowling all rounders
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,417
That’s a very hard standard to live up to.

To produce those type of stats at both batting and bowling you’re talking about an absolute freak of an athlete. I doubt we’ll ever see a better all rounder than Kallis. He’s really the Bradman of all rounders.

Kallis and Sobers best batting all-rounders,Imran Khan and Keith Miller best bowling all-rounders
 
Messages
11,722
That’s a very hard standard to live up to.

To produce those type of stats at both batting and bowling you’re talking about an absolute freak of an athlete. I doubt we’ll ever see a better all rounder than Kallis. He’s really the Bradman of all rounders.

You'd think though that over the course of the games' history there'd be at least one produced.

Can't agree with Kallis - he was always a batsman whose bowling was secondary to him. Don't think he'd make a Saffa side if he didn't bat.

Never watched him play obviously but I reckon Miller was the closest one. Averaged near 49 in FC cricket in a time when international players played domestically. Shame he couldn't quite transfer that record to Tests.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,586
In all seriousness anyone who averaged over 30 with the bat and under 30 with the ball consistently still rings true as a genuine all rounder IMO.

It's unbelievably rare to be markedly better than that when you have to focus on two disciplines. A guy like Smith can face thousands of balls and then trundle out three overs of leggies because that's all he needs to do...
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,417
I just randomly got cranky that Shaun Pollock isn't talked about when discussing all-rounders

32 with the bat and 23 with the ball is vastly superior to the Kapil Devs.Ian Botham's and Andrew Flintoffs of this world

Cricket world should be ashamed and mercilessly mocked for this disgrace lol
 

Latest posts

Top