What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2019 ASHES: 4th Test Australia v England, Old Trafford Sept 4-9

Meth

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
35,741
To state the obvious, Australia don't win the Ashes without Smith. He is the sort of player that really does make all the difference.
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,416
If Jack Wighton was Ben Stokes last test he would've hit a six from a 145km yorker to win the match, only to swing his bat around onto his stumps in his follow through

Paul Osbourne up there with Jacky boy too bruh in the all-rounder stakes

Osbourne robust forward and Woolies thief a deadly combo for the ages
 
Messages
21,880
You'd think though that over the course of the games' history there'd be at least one produced.

Can't agree with Kallis - he was always a batsman whose bowling was secondary to him. Don't think he'd make a Saffa side if he didn't bat.

Never watched him play obviously but I reckon Miller was the closest one. Averaged near 49 in FC cricket in a time when international players played domestically. Shame he couldn't quite transfer that record to Tests.

I edited my post after calling him the Bradman of all rounders, he wasn’t quite that. But he’s the best batting all rounder ever.
 

Meth

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
35,741
It's kinda similar to when Richard Hadlee bent Australia over back in the day all by himself bruh with no help

Yes, but every match. At least with the bat. If Smith performs (which he tends to), Australia is a chance...in fact, they are likely to win. If not, there's nothing. It'll all depend on the bowlers.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,586
I just randomly got cranky that Shaun Pollock isn't talked about when discussing all-rounders

32 with the bat and 23 with the ball is vastly superior to the Kapil Devs.Ian Botham's and Andrew Flintoffs of this world

Cricket world should be ashamed and mercilessly mocked for this disgrace lol

I think people often forget about Pollock and how good he was tbh, especially as a bowler.

Having his career spread over the Allan Donald and Dale Steyn eras for SA doesn't help. He kind of gets seen as an honest toiler when compared to those two, which is totally unfair because he was an excellent cricketer. He was also just as good in both red and white ball cricket.

But people remember the guys like White Lightning and old crazy eyes Steyn more readily than a guy like Pollock.
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,416
Yes, but every match. At least with the bat. If Smith performs (which he tends to), Australia is a chance...in fact, they are likely to win. If not, there's nothing. It'll all depend on the bowlers.

Culture Club would still have number 1 hits to this day if Boy George didn't get depressed from watching Mark Greatbatch throw away his wicket all the time bruh
 

VictoryFC

Bench
Messages
3,786
I think people often forget about Pollock and how good he was tbh, especially as a bowler.

Having his career spread over the Allan Donald and Dale Steyn eras for SA doesn't help. He kind of gets seen as an honest toiler when compared to those two, which is totally unfair because he was an excellent cricketer. He was also just as good in both red and white ball cricket.

But people remember the guys like White Lightning and old crazy eyes Steyn more readily than a guy like Pollock.

All depends on the person in question. If you're in your 20-30s, Pollock is just as memorable as any of the Saffers since. Personally I remember him much more for his bowling than batting, even though he was good at both.
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,416
I think people often forget about Pollock and how good he was tbh, especially as a bowler.

Having his career spread over the Allan Donald and Dale Steyn eras for SA doesn't help. He kind of gets seen as an honest toiler when compared to those two, which is totally unfair because he was an excellent cricketer. He was also just as good in both red and white ball cricket.

But people remember the guys like White Lightning and old crazy eyes Steyn more readily than a guy like Pollock.

Yeah to be honest i only just remembered a few mins ago how good Shaun Pollock was,he is the forgotten man of the all-rounders of this world,he was a brilliant cricketer
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,586
All depends on the person in question. If you're in your 20-30s, Pollock is just as memorable as any of the Saffers since. Personally I remember him much more for his bowling than batting, even though he was good at both.

Point is which is the general cricket fan more likely to reminisce over...a terrifying Allan Donald/Dale Steyn five-for where he shattered stumps and hit blokes in the face at 145kph, or a hard working Pollock five-for where he nipped blokes out with sustained pressure and gentle away swing at 132kph?
 

VictoryFC

Bench
Messages
3,786
So what are we all thinking about tonight?

Out for 180 and in bed by midnight. Cummins made the 4am stay worth it, but once is enough
 

Latest posts

Top