To state the obvious, Australia don't win the Ashes without Smith. He is the sort of player that really does make all the difference.
What about Ewan Chatfield brah? Or Jeremy Coney?It's kinda similar to when Richard Hadlee bent Australia over back in the day all by himself bruh with no help
No love for The Bison in this debate?
Best allrounder has got to be Gary Gilmour closely followed by Hilton Cartwright.
Best pom Chris Lewis
What about Ewan Chatfield brah? Or Jeremy Coney?
If Jack Wighton was Ben Stokes last test he would've hit a six from a 145km yorker to win the match, only to swing his bat around onto his stumps in his follow through
You'd think though that over the course of the games' history there'd be at least one produced.
Can't agree with Kallis - he was always a batsman whose bowling was secondary to him. Don't think he'd make a Saffa side if he didn't bat.
Never watched him play obviously but I reckon Miller was the closest one. Averaged near 49 in FC cricket in a time when international players played domestically. Shame he couldn't quite transfer that record to Tests.
This actually feels like the only type of situation that Wade thrives in. It's a sticky situation innings wise, but we're so far ahead in the match that all pressure is off. Wade to made a plucky 30 here, just watch
It's kinda similar to when Richard Hadlee bent Australia over back in the day all by himself bruh with no help
I just randomly got cranky that Shaun Pollock isn't talked about when discussing all-rounders
32 with the bat and 23 with the ball is vastly superior to the Kapil Devs.Ian Botham's and Andrew Flintoffs of this world
Cricket world should be ashamed and mercilessly mocked for this disgrace lol
Yes, but every match. At least with the bat. If Smith performs (which he tends to), Australia is a chance...in fact, they are likely to win. If not, there's nothing. It'll all depend on the bowlers.
I think people often forget about Pollock and how good he was tbh, especially as a bowler.
Having his career spread over the Allan Donald and Dale Steyn eras for SA doesn't help. He kind of gets seen as an honest toiler when compared to those two, which is totally unfair because he was an excellent cricketer. He was also just as good in both red and white ball cricket.
But people remember the guys like White Lightning and old crazy eyes Steyn more readily than a guy like Pollock.
I think people often forget about Pollock and how good he was tbh, especially as a bowler.
Having his career spread over the Allan Donald and Dale Steyn eras for SA doesn't help. He kind of gets seen as an honest toiler when compared to those two, which is totally unfair because he was an excellent cricketer. He was also just as good in both red and white ball cricket.
But people remember the guys like White Lightning and old crazy eyes Steyn more readily than a guy like Pollock.
All depends on the person in question. If you're in your 20-30s, Pollock is just as memorable as any of the Saffers since. Personally I remember him much more for his bowling than batting, even though he was good at both.
Shaun Pollock is too ugly to be considered.
Keith Miller was at his best with a horse blanket on.