greenBV4
Bench
- Messages
- 2,510
Thats all well and good but as others have pointed out (usually in defence of these clubs, when it suits), the fanbases of these clubs aren't just restricted to the named suburb.1) Balmain Leichhardt- 15.8%
2) Campbelltown- 6.5%
3) Penrith- 6.3%
4) Suth shire and Wollongong 5.5%
5) St George 4.4 %
6) northern Beaches 3.7%
7) Auckland 0.86%
8) Townsville 0.68%
9) Newcastle 0.45%
10) Gold Coast 0.18%
11) Brisbane 0.08%
12) Melbourne 0.04%
For example, if Redcliffe or another suburban team were to get a license, would you of used all of Brisbane for the Broncos then just Redcliffe for the Dolphins? or divided the city in 2?
Using those figures you could argue that the Melbourne Storm only represent the 169,961 people living in the suburb of Melbourne, and Brisbane 9,460
But Melbourne and Brisbane do gather support city wide (helped by being 1 team cities), and if the Sydney clubs can only gather support from within their suburb, then they don't deserve a National Rugby League license... luckily most of them do, so I'd argue a more accurate (but still not 100% accurate) representation of your figures would be to dived Sydney's population by 9, or 8.5
Last edited: