I guess there’s some certainty over where you are living, but even if you own, you still may not be able to move if you wanted to
Did they really rent where they should have then? My yield comparison was like for like, but if I downgraded then I’m raking in the dough
In Sydney and Melbourne, truthfully based mostly on my own research but like for like I was better off renting each place than buying to live in it. It’s part of the reason market low, rental yield doesn’t reflect cost.
Well we’re not talking about the same level of finance because if people had the funds, they’d be buying a house presumably. Admittedly buying a house is probably “simpler” investment than other investments with lower entry points but research is the cost of the market at the moment.
Anyone who wasn’t just whining about house prices the past 5 or so years and had been preparing their finances is now well primed to buy in.
We could go around and around here, so rather than address all this i'll make just a coupla points.
Firstly, there is a clear historical difference in wealth between those that own their own home and those that do not, I don't think you'd argue that point, and it probably goes a lot to the idea you present of it being "simpler", that is what it is. There'd be many a reason, but like for like home ownership has been very good to the past few generations in terms of improving their standard of living, but that has been at the expense of those coming through, that should prices remain so high, will not see the benefit of this.
And secondly, your last sentence goes to the point of where it's not all bad news, sure, it sucks for those who have bought in over the last coupla years, but there's always winners and losers in investment, the winners now will be more of those that where priced out of the market, at for the most part that will come at the expense of those that have done ok out of it, and end up with a slightly lower return than they thought they'd get. I don't think that's all that bad a thing TBH